> I don't currently use PostgreSQL, but I plan to migrate and I have a
question
> about the best way/strategy for storing images. I have about 2 million
images
> with a growth trend of around 1 million images per year. I plan to store
in bytea
> format in an isolated table. Is this recommended? Is
>
> As a non-SQL expert who's used postgres since 1997 I've come to believe the
> basic issue is that SQL is based on sets, neither procedural or object
> oriented. Few people think in sets so they try to fit SQL into what they
> know rather than understand the how sets work.
>
Yes, that's 100% co
