Probably duplicate for BUG #19009 / BUG #19010.
po 4. 8. 2025 v 17:01 odesílatel Aleš Zelený napsal:
> Hello,
> I've found that PGDG16 repository access is failing (while last Thursday
> it worked):
>
> Example - pgdg 17 works, pgdg16 doesn't work:
>
> $ yum repolist pgdg16 pgdg17
> repo id
Hello,
I've found that PGDG16 repository access is failing (while last Thursday it
worked):
Example - pgdg 17 works, pgdg16 doesn't work:
$ yum repolist pgdg16 pgdg17
repo id repo name
status
pgdg16 PostgreSQL 16 for RHEL / Rocky / AlmaLinu
Dear PostgreSQL Community Team,
I hope this message finds you well.
I’m currently exploring options for implementing a staging (intermediate)
database to handle outbound data exports from an SAP ERP system. I would
like to inquire whether PostgreSQL is considered a suitable and stable
solution fo
On Monday, August 4, 2025, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Sunday, August 3, 2025, 矫顺田 wrote:
>
>> What is the specific release date of PG18?
>>
>
> Here is some data to let you make an informed decision. Ignore anything
> before 9.0 I suppose. IIRC it will be almost certainly be a Thursday.
>
>
On Sunday, August 3, 2025, 矫顺田 wrote:
> What is the specific release date of PG18?
>
Here is some data to let you make an informed decision. Ignore anything
before 9.0 I suppose. IIRC it will be almost certainly be a Thursday.
David J.
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 at 18:59, 矫顺田 wrote:
> What is the specific release date of PG18?
The exact date is not yet determined.
Per [1], the approximate time is "September/October 2025". You might
also look at the date we released previous versions, but there's
absolutely no guarantee that it'll end
