On 7/2/25 07:26, Durumdara wrote:
Sorry.
I forgot to mention that I have two arrays (records).
One for the modifiable elements, and one for the checkable elements.
If there is a conflict between the actual mod. item and one of the
checkable items, the checkable item will move to the end of the
On Wed, 2025-07-02 at 20:12 +0530, Gaurav Aradhya wrote:
> Can you please let me know when Postgresql 17.x shall be supported for
> Windows Server 2025? Greatly appreciated your feedback.
If you want to know if it is working, the best answer is "as soon as
someone donates a Windows 2025 buildfarm
On 7/2/25 07:42, Gaurav Aradhya wrote:
Greetings,
Can you please let me know when Postgresql 17.x shall be supported for
Windows Server 2025? Greatly appreciated your feedback.
The Windows packaging is done by EDB, someone from there will need to
see this and respond or you could contact th
On Wednesday, July 2, 2025, Gaurav Aradhya wrote:
>
> Can you please let me know when Postgresql 17.x shall be supported for
> Windows Server 2025? Greatly appreciated your feedback.
>
Impossible to guess when someone may choose to set up a build farm member
running that OS.
David J.
Greetings,
Can you please let me know when Postgresql 17.x shall be supported for
Windows Server 2025? Greatly appreciated your feedback.
Thanks
Gaurav
I don't know exactly what I did wrong but redoing what I described in the
email worked perfectly! Thanks everyone!
Enviado do Gmail para celular
Em seg., 30 de jun. de 2025 às 15:35, Franklin Anderson de Oliveira Souza <
frankli...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> I'm trying to simulate a PITR in postgr
Sorry.
I forgot to mention that I have two arrays (records).
One for the modifiable elements, and one for the checkable elements.
If there is a conflict between the actual mod. item and one of the
checkable items, the checkable item will move to the end of the
modification list.
And the actual mo
On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 8:21 AM Durumdara wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have to store some fetched records into two lists (arrays) to work with
> them.
>
There's almost certainly a way to do what you need done without using
arrays. Might require a bit of rethinking, though.
--
Death to , and butter sa
On Wednesday, July 2, 2025, Durumdara wrote:
>
>
> Is there any way to avoid this? To use a "simple untyped record" in an
> array without "dependencies"?
>
Use jsonb
David J.
Hello!
I have to store some fetched records into two lists (arrays) to work with
them.
I can use the RECORD type in a FOR SELECT loop to get one row data.
declare
f record;
begin
for f in select title, length
But if I tried to define an "array of record", I got an error message.
declare
10 matches
Mail list logo
