Fix numeric_mul() overflow due to too many digits after decimal point.
This fixes an overflow error when using the numeric * operator if the
result has more than 16383 digits after the decimal point by rounding
the result. Overflow errors should only occur if the result has too
many digits *before
Fix numeric_mul() overflow due to too many digits after decimal point.
This fixes an overflow error when using the numeric * operator if the
result has more than 16383 digits after the decimal point by rounding
the result. Overflow errors should only occur if the result has too
many digits *before
Fix numeric_mul() overflow due to too many digits after decimal point.
This fixes an overflow error when using the numeric * operator if the
result has more than 16383 digits after the decimal point by rounding
the result. Overflow errors should only occur if the result has too
many digits *before
Fix numeric_mul() overflow due to too many digits after decimal point.
This fixes an overflow error when using the numeric * operator if the
result has more than 16383 digits after the decimal point by rounding
the result. Overflow errors should only occur if the result has too
many digits *before
Fix numeric_mul() overflow due to too many digits after decimal point.
This fixes an overflow error when using the numeric * operator if the
result has more than 16383 digits after the decimal point by rounding
the result. Overflow errors should only occur if the result has too
many digits *before
Fix numeric_mul() overflow due to too many digits after decimal point.
This fixes an overflow error when using the numeric * operator if the
result has more than 16383 digits after the decimal point by rounding
the result. Overflow errors should only occur if the result has too
many digits *before
Fix numeric_mul() overflow due to too many digits after decimal point.
This fixes an overflow error when using the numeric * operator if the
result has more than 16383 digits after the decimal point by rounding
the result. Overflow errors should only occur if the result has too
many digits *before
Add more sanity checks in SASL exchanges
The following checks are added, to make the SASL infrastructure more
aware of defects when implementing new mechanisms:
- Detect that no output is generated by a mechanism if an exchange fails
in the backend, failing if there is a message waiting to be sent
Dean Rasheed writes:
> This fixes an overflow error when using the numeric * operator if the
> result has more than 16383 digits after the decimal point by rounding
> the result. Overflow errors should only occur if the result has too
> many digits *before* the decimal point.
I think this needs a
On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 16:01, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I think this needs a bit more thought. Before, a case like
> select 1e-16000 * 1e-16000;
> produced
> ERROR: value overflows numeric format
> Now you get an exact zero (with a lot of trailing zeroes, but still
> it's just zero).
Fix busted test for ldap_initialize.
Sigh ... I was expecting AC_CHECK_LIB to do something it didn't,
namely update LIBS. This led to not finding ldap_initialize.
Fix by moving the probe for ldap_initialize. In some sense this
is more correct anyway, since (at least for now) we care about
whethe
Fix busted test for ldap_initialize.
Sigh ... I was expecting AC_CHECK_LIB to do something it didn't,
namely update LIBS. This led to not finding ldap_initialize.
Fix by moving the probe for ldap_initialize. In some sense this
is more correct anyway, since (at least for now) we care about
whethe
Fix busted test for ldap_initialize.
Sigh ... I was expecting AC_CHECK_LIB to do something it didn't,
namely update LIBS. This led to not finding ldap_initialize.
Fix by moving the probe for ldap_initialize. In some sense this
is more correct anyway, since (at least for now) we care about
whethe
Fix busted test for ldap_initialize.
Sigh ... I was expecting AC_CHECK_LIB to do something it didn't,
namely update LIBS. This led to not finding ldap_initialize.
Fix by moving the probe for ldap_initialize. In some sense this
is more correct anyway, since (at least for now) we care about
whethe
Fix busted test for ldap_initialize.
Sigh ... I was expecting AC_CHECK_LIB to do something it didn't,
namely update LIBS. This led to not finding ldap_initialize.
Fix by moving the probe for ldap_initialize. In some sense this
is more correct anyway, since (at least for now) we care about
whethe
Fix assign_record_type_typmod().
If an error occurred in the wrong place, it was possible to leave an
unintialized entry in the hash table, leading to a crash. Fixed.
Also, be more careful about the order of operations so that an
allocation error doesn't leak memory in CacheMemoryContext or
unnec
Fix assign_record_type_typmod().
If an error occurred in the wrong place, it was possible to leave an
unintialized entry in the hash table, leading to a crash. Fixed.
Also, be more careful about the order of operations so that an
allocation error doesn't leak memory in CacheMemoryContext or
unnec
Fix assign_record_type_typmod().
If an error occurred in the wrong place, it was possible to leave an
unintialized entry in the hash table, leading to a crash. Fixed.
Also, be more careful about the order of operations so that an
allocation error doesn't leak memory in CacheMemoryContext or
unnec
Fix assign_record_type_typmod().
If an error occurred in the wrong place, it was possible to leave an
unintialized entry in the hash table, leading to a crash. Fixed.
Also, be more careful about the order of operations so that an
allocation error doesn't leak memory in CacheMemoryContext or
unnec
Fix assign_record_type_typmod().
If an error occurred in the wrong place, it was possible to leave an
unintialized entry in the hash table, leading to a crash. Fixed.
Also, be more careful about the order of operations so that an
allocation error doesn't leak memory in CacheMemoryContext or
unnec
20 matches
Mail list logo
