Update comments about progress reporting by index_drop
Michaël Paquier complained that index_drop is requesting progress
reporting for non-obvious reasons, so let's add a comment to explain
why.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Detail
Update comments about progress reporting by index_drop
Michaël Paquier complained that index_drop is requesting progress
reporting for non-obvious reasons, so let's add a comment to explain
why.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Branch
--
master
Details
-
Fix typo
Apparently while this code was being developed,
ReindexRelationConcurrently operated on multiple relations. The version
that was ultimately pushed doesn't, so this comment's use of plural is
inaccurate.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/89403
Fix typo
Apparently while this code was being developed,
ReindexRelationConcurrently operated on multiple relations. The version
that was ultimately pushed doesn't, so this comment's use of plural is
inaccurate.
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdif
Make crash recovery ignore recovery_min_apply_delay setting.
In v11 or before, this setting could not take effect in crash recovery
because it's specified in recovery.conf and crash recovery always
starts without recovery.conf. But commit 2dedf4d9a8 integrated
recovery.conf into postgresql.conf an
Make crash recovery ignore recovery_min_apply_delay setting.
In v11 or before, this setting could not take effect in crash recovery
because it's specified in recovery.conf and crash recovery always
starts without recovery.conf. But commit 2dedf4d9a8 integrated
recovery.conf into postgresql.conf an
Fix failure of archive recovery with recovery_min_apply_delay enabled.
recovery_min_apply_delay parameter is intended for use with streaming
replication deployments. However, the document clearly explains that
the parameter will be honored in all cases if it's specified. So it should
take effect e
Fix failure of archive recovery with recovery_min_apply_delay enabled.
recovery_min_apply_delay parameter is intended for use with streaming
replication deployments. However, the document clearly explains that
the parameter will be honored in all cases if it's specified. So it should
take effect e
Fix failure of archive recovery with recovery_min_apply_delay enabled.
recovery_min_apply_delay parameter is intended for use with streaming
replication deployments. However, the document clearly explains that
the parameter will be honored in all cases if it's specified. So it should
take effect e
Fix failure of archive recovery with recovery_min_apply_delay enabled.
recovery_min_apply_delay parameter is intended for use with streaming
replication deployments. However, the document clearly explains that
the parameter will be honored in all cases if it's specified. So it should
take effect e
Fix failure of archive recovery with recovery_min_apply_delay enabled.
recovery_min_apply_delay parameter is intended for use with streaming
replication deployments. However, the document clearly explains that
the parameter will be honored in all cases if it's specified. So it should
take effect e
Fix failure of archive recovery with recovery_min_apply_delay enabled.
recovery_min_apply_delay parameter is intended for use with streaming
replication deployments. However, the document clearly explains that
the parameter will be honored in all cases if it's specified. So it should
take effect e
Fix failure of archive recovery with recovery_min_apply_delay enabled.
recovery_min_apply_delay parameter is intended for use with streaming
replication deployments. However, the document clearly explains that
the parameter will be honored in all cases if it's specified. So it should
take effect e
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:14 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 6:10 AM Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > doc: Further clarify how recovery target parameters are applied
> >
> > Recovery target parameters are all applied even in standby mode. The
> > previous documentation mostly w
Remove last traces of heap_open/close in the tree
Since pluggable storage has been introduced, those two routines have
been replaced by table_open/close, with some compatibility macros still
present to allow extensions to compile correctly with v12.
Some code paths using the old routines still re
For PowerPC instruction "addi", use constraint "b".
Without "b", a variant of the tas() code miscompiles on macOS 10.4.
This may also fix a compilation failure involving macOS 10.1. Today's
compilers have been allocating acceptable registers with or without this
change, but this future-proofs the
For PowerPC instruction "addi", use constraint "b".
Without "b", a variant of the tas() code miscompiles on macOS 10.4.
This may also fix a compilation failure involving macOS 10.1. Today's
compilers have been allocating acceptable registers with or without this
change, but this future-proofs the
Use standard compare_exchange loop style in ProcArrayGroupClearXid().
Besides style, this might improve performance in the contended case.
Reviewed by Amit Kapila.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgre
For PowerPC instruction "addi", use constraint "b".
Without "b", a variant of the tas() code miscompiles on macOS 10.4.
This may also fix a compilation failure involving macOS 10.1. Today's
compilers have been allocating acceptable registers with or without this
change, but this future-proofs the
For PowerPC instruction "addi", use constraint "b".
Without "b", a variant of the tas() code miscompiles on macOS 10.4.
This may also fix a compilation failure involving macOS 10.1. Today's
compilers have been allocating acceptable registers with or without this
change, but this future-proofs the
For PowerPC instruction "addi", use constraint "b".
Without "b", a variant of the tas() code miscompiles on macOS 10.4.
This may also fix a compilation failure involving macOS 10.1. Today's
compilers have been allocating acceptable registers with or without this
change, but this future-proofs the
For PowerPC instruction "addi", use constraint "b".
Without "b", a variant of the tas() code miscompiles on macOS 10.4.
This may also fix a compilation failure involving macOS 10.1. Today's
compilers have been allocating acceptable registers with or without this
change, but this future-proofs the
For all ppc compilers, implement compare_exchange and fetch_add with asm.
This is more like how we handle s_lock.h and arch-x86.h.
Reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/
For PowerPC instruction "addi", use constraint "b".
Without "b", a variant of the tas() code miscompiles on macOS 10.4.
This may also fix a compilation failure involving macOS 10.1. Today's
compilers have been allocating acceptable registers with or without this
change, but this future-proofs the
24 matches
Mail list logo
