Remove bogus "extern" annotations on function definitions.
While this is not illegal C, project style is to put "extern" only on
declarations not definitions.
David Rowley
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cakjs1f9rklwxcmbqhvdyhmsmeo+alunga-ne+ax5uoke9dj...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
D
Allow UNIQUE indexes on partitioned tables
If we restrict unique constraints on partitioned tables so that they
must always include the partition key, then our standard approach to
unique indexes already works --- each unique key is forced to exist
within a single partition, so enforcing the uniqu
Fix expected output
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4108a28d3a02c4226b0f558cf00738e00e8ea2a1
Modified Files
--
src/test/regress/expected/indexing.out | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Fix misbehavior of CTE-used-in-a-subplan during EPQ rechecks.
An updating query that reads a CTE within an InitPlan or SubPlan could get
incorrect results if it updates rows that are concurrently being modified.
This is caused by CteScanNext supposing that nothing inside its recursive
ExecProcNode
Fix misbehavior of CTE-used-in-a-subplan during EPQ rechecks.
An updating query that reads a CTE within an InitPlan or SubPlan could get
incorrect results if it updates rows that are concurrently being modified.
This is caused by CteScanNext supposing that nothing inside its recursive
ExecProcNode
Fix misbehavior of CTE-used-in-a-subplan during EPQ rechecks.
An updating query that reads a CTE within an InitPlan or SubPlan could get
incorrect results if it updates rows that are concurrently being modified.
This is caused by CteScanNext supposing that nothing inside its recursive
ExecProcNode
Fix misbehavior of CTE-used-in-a-subplan during EPQ rechecks.
An updating query that reads a CTE within an InitPlan or SubPlan could get
incorrect results if it updates rows that are concurrently being modified.
This is caused by CteScanNext supposing that nothing inside its recursive
ExecProcNode
Fix misbehavior of CTE-used-in-a-subplan during EPQ rechecks.
An updating query that reads a CTE within an InitPlan or SubPlan could get
incorrect results if it updates rows that are concurrently being modified.
This is caused by CteScanNext supposing that nothing inside its recursive
ExecProcNode
Fix misbehavior of CTE-used-in-a-subplan during EPQ rechecks.
An updating query that reads a CTE within an InitPlan or SubPlan could get
incorrect results if it updates rows that are concurrently being modified.
This is caused by CteScanNext supposing that nothing inside its recursive
ExecProcNode
Fix crash in pg_replication_slot_advance
We were trying to use a LSN variable after releasing its containing slot
structure.
Reported by: tushar
Author: amul sul
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Bran
10 matches
Mail list logo