een calls.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Derek
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 1:26 PM Barry Smith wrote:
>
>>
>>You absolutely should not need to do an assembly after a VecSet.
>> Please post a full reproducer that demonstrates the problem.
>>
>> Barry
>>
Hi,
I was under the (mistaken) impression that one does not need to due a
VecAssemblyBegin etc following a VecSet, e.g.
VecSet(dn_local, 0.);
VecAssemblyBegin(dn_local) ;
VecAssemblyEnd(dn_local) ;
Seems to give different results without the Assembly.
Thanks for clarifying,
D
Dear All,
I have a question and a comment on the TSEIMEX scheme in the TS routines.
1/ Looking at the cited reference, I see three schemes there 2.4b, 2.4c, 2.4d
. It is not clear which of these is being implemented.
2/ The documentation for EIMEX mixes up F(u, udot ) and G(u) relative to t
