On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 1:46 PM Barry Smith wrote:
>
> The guards are supposed to be universal, not one-offs that are put into
> specific locations. How come no errors with debug mode are detected in this
> situation?]
>
Hmm, VecSet() has
PetscCall(VecSetErrorIfLocked(x, 1));
which shoul
The guards are supposed to be universal, not one-offs that are put into
specific locations. How come no errors with debug mode are detected in this
situation?
Barry
> On Apr 26, 2025, at 1:09 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
> Junchao, should we put guards in VecSet() and LocalToGlobal() fo
Junchao, should we put guards in VecSet() and LocalToGlobal() for the array
lock?
Thanks,
Matt
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 11:50 AM Junchao Zhang
wrote:
> Yes, that is correct.
>
> --Junchao Zhang
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 10:35 AM Derek Teaney
> wrote:
>
>> Ok -- got it -- thanks so j
Yes, that is correct.
--Junchao Zhang
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 10:35 AM Derek Teaney
wrote:
> Ok -- got it -- thanks so just do the RestoreArray before the final step,
> e.g.
>
> Loop over cases
> VecSet(dn_local, 0.)
> GetArray(dn_local, &dn) // RIGHT
> Fill up dn
> Re
Toby (Cc'ed) might know it. Or could you provide an example?
--Junchao Zhang
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 3:31 AM Klaij, Christiaan via petsc-users <
petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> We recently upgraded from 3.19.4 to 3.22.4 but face the problem below with
> the nested logging. Any ideas?
>
> Chr
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 8:27 AM Derek Teaney via petsc-users <
petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Thanks Barry -- this solved the issue.
>
> "probably will be fine" was fine with 3.17 and maybe 3.19, but definitely
> not fine with 3.20.
>
> For others the faulty logic is:
>
> GetArray(dn_local, &d
Thanks Barry -- this solved the issue.
"probably will be fine" was fine with 3.17 and maybe 3.19, but definitely
not fine with 3.20.
For others the faulty logic is:
GetArray(dn_local, &dn) //WRONG
Loop over cases
VecSet(dn_local, 0.)
Fill up dn
LocalToGlobal
RestoreArray
Whe
