Thanks, i was able to find the bug and correct it, it is working now,
I was calling a wrong DM for some DA,
Regards,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Manuel Valera writes:
>
> > Thanks Jed,
> >
> > I got the attached, it looks is coming from one of my routines
> > CorrectU4
Manuel Valera writes:
> Thanks Jed,
>
> I got the attached, it looks is coming from one of my routines
> CorrectU4Pressure.F90, what other information can i get from this log?
If you compile with debug info (COPTFLAGS=-g FOPTFLAGS=-g) you'll be
able to see the source line that's causing this err
Thanks Jed,
I got the attached, it looks is coming from one of my routines
CorrectU4Pressure.F90, what other information can i get from this log?
Thanks,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Manuel Valera writes:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I am working on running part of my
Manuel Valera writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am working on running part of my code in a GPU, recently i was able to
> run the whole model using one P100 GPU and one processor with good timing
> but using --with-debugging=1 as configure argument,
>
> With this in mind i compiled PETSc in a separ
Hello everyone,
I am working on running part of my code in a GPU, recently i was able to
run the whole model using one P100 GPU and one processor with good timing
but using --with-debugging=1 as configure argument,
With this in mind i compiled PETSc in a separate folder with the same exact
flags
Hi:
I have a simple code myself to learn the basic usage of nest matrix. It
assembles a 3x3 nest matrix and solve with that nest matrix. I can run it
without a preconditioner. Running the code with -pc_type fieldsplit just
leads to an error message. I have no clue of what goes wrong. The message
i
Your "sparse" matrix is too dense to realistically use coloring to compute
the Jacobian.
Use instead SNESComputeJacobianDefault
Barry
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 9:06 AM, Florian Kauer wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I was just testing out if my calculations also work for several 1
> variables a
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:12 AM Florian Kauer
wrote:
> Hi,
> I was just testing out if my calculations also work for several 1
> variables and got the following error. Is this a fundamental limit with
> very large (or complex) systems of equations or does it hint to a bug/wrong
> configurati
Hi,
I was just testing out if my calculations also work for several 1 variables
and got the following error. Is this a fundamental limit with very large (or
complex) systems of equations or does it hint to a bug/wrong configuration in
my program? Everything works fine for smaller systems.
[
