Re: [Pdns-users] DNSSEC Validations and max-cache-bogus-ttl

2025-06-11 Thread Otto Moerbeek via Pdns-users
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 04:56:14PM +0200, Jan-Piet Mens via Pdns-users wrote: > > rec_control add-nta domain.example botched keyroll > > > > would set dnssec validations for domain.example. to "off"? > > Correct, though the multple arguments as reason look a bit suspicious to me; I > can

Re: [Pdns-users] DNSSEC Validations and max-cache-bogus-ttl

2025-06-11 Thread Jan-Piet Mens via Pdns-users
rec_control add-nta domain.example botched keyroll would set dnssec validations for domain.example. to "off"? Correct, though the multple arguments as reason look a bit suspicious to me; I cannot test now, but it might be you have to quote the "botched keyroll" arguments. -JP _

Re: [Pdns-users] DNSSEC Validations and max-cache-bogus-ttl

2025-06-11 Thread rob777 via Pdns-users
Thanks - i didnt know this parameter - so basically this... rec_control add-nta domain.example botched keyroll Added Negative Trust Anchor for domain.example. with reason 'botched keyroll' would set dnssec validations for domain.example. to "off"? Am Mi., 11. Juni 2025 um 16:21 Uhr

Re: [Pdns-users] DNSSEC Validations and max-cache-bogus-ttl

2025-06-11 Thread Jan-Piet Mens via Pdns-users
I think the safest in this situation would be to add a Negative Trust Anchor (NTA) [1] in order to temporarily disable DNSSEC validation in your Recursor for that particular authoritative zone. While the NTA [2] is active you could try contacting the operator of the (obviously) broken authoritativ