Re: [Pdns-users] problem with 4.1.0 recursion removed

2019-08-11 Thread Brian Candler
On 11/08/2019 18:12, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote: Hmm. Might it also work to do something really simple involving more than one recursor? If the primary recursor had something like this: forward-zones-recurse=e164.arpa=10.0.0.11;1.1.1.1 ...and the one at 10.0.0.11 then had: forward-zones=e164.a

Re: [Pdns-users] problem with 4.1.0 recursion removed

2019-08-11 Thread Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via Pdns-users
Juha Heinanen via Pdns-users writes: > Some of the e164.arpa domains used in my SIP Proxy environment are > private and thus (on purpose), are not registered under e164.arpa. Depending on what software you're using, it may be possible to work around this by using another DNS domain. With Asteri

Re: [Pdns-users] problem with 4.1.0 recursion removed

2019-08-10 Thread Juha Heinanen via Pdns-users
Is there some good reason why backwards compatibility was not provided by a recursor.conf setting that would make it to send all requests to the authoritative server and if server responds to a request with not found, recursor would send the request to the Internet? -- Juha ___

Re: [Pdns-users] problem with 4.1.0 recursion removed

2019-08-10 Thread Juha Heinanen via Pdns-users
Brian Candler writes: > * You can forward e164.arpa to your own authoritative nameserver(s) with > a single static entry, and all subdomains will be forwarded.  Of course, > no other domains under e164.arpa will resolve, since you've made > yourself authoritative for the whole domain. > > * Yo

Re: [Pdns-users] problem with 4.1.0 recursion removed

2019-08-10 Thread Brian Candler
On 10/08/2019 07:24, Juha Heinanen via Pdns-users wrote: I have been using 4.0.x pdns/recursor setup to serve DNS records of phone numbers. For example, a domain name in records table could be 1.7.6.5.4.3.2.3.8.5.3.e164.arpa. Phone numbers can be random, i.e., they don't necessarily share a com

[Pdns-users] problem with 4.1.0 recursion removed

2019-08-09 Thread Juha Heinanen via Pdns-users
I have been using 4.0.x pdns/recursor setup to serve DNS records of phone numbers. For example, a domain name in records table could be 1.7.6.5.4.3.2.3.8.5.3.e164.arpa. Phone numbers can be random, i.e., they don't necessarily share a common prefix. The records are added/removed dynamically when