On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:24:57 +0100
"Alex Kiernan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/10/2007, Darren Gamble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The issue is, quite simply, that doing this has higher resourcing
> > requirements and higher latency than simply having "plain" caches behind
> > the load bal
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 10:27:09AM -0400, Patrick Domack wrote:
> I suppose if you didn't care about memory, you could push the incoming
> replies each server receives to the other servers. Then you wouldn't
> have to check each server or have a time issue.
It seems that if you really cared ab
On 15/10/2007, Darren Gamble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good day,
>
> > What I want to know is: Can I set my pdns-recursor servers to check
> each
> > others cache before asking the root zones ?
>
> Thanks to everyone else who's replied so far.
>
> This configuration is something that we've also
Good day,
> What I want to know is: Can I set my pdns-recursor servers to check
each
> others cache before asking the root zones ?
Thanks to everyone else who's replied so far.
This configuration is something that we've also examined.
The issue is, quite simply, that doing this has higher resou
Brendan Oakley wrote:
> Hi Mick,
>
> Depending on the application and purpose for wanting a shared cache, I
There is another option that might work here. You might be able to
employee something like memcached for storing queries/answers, memcached
can be setup to share memory between different se
Hi Mick,
Depending on the application and purpose for wanting a shared cache, I
might try forwarding all queries to a single "master" recursor which
only serves the "front-end" servers, performing all root server
queries. It would only receive the queries that the front-end servers
cannot answer f
I suppose if you didn't care about memory, you could push the incoming
replies each server receives to the other servers. Then you wouldn't
have to check each server or have a time issue.
Quoting Jan Gyselinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:30:11PM +1000, Mick Pollard wrote
Jan Gyselinck wrote:
> No you can't. I know Bert was toying around with a couple of ideas
> in that direction, the main problem is the fact that checking locally
> (before fetching it from the right location) costs time and thus
> increases the query-response latency. In practice the problem see
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:30:11PM +1000, Mick Pollard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been asked to put together a suggestion for a new caching-dns setup
> for our company.
> I have had a look at the recursor.conf options and can't find anything to
> help.
> We will have a hardware load balancer wi
Hi all,
I have been asked to put together a suggestion for a new caching-dns setup for
our company.
I have had a look at the recursor.conf options and can't find anything to help.
We will have a hardware load balancer with x amount of servers running
pdns-recursor behind it..
What I want to know
10 matches
Mail list logo
