On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 04:27:18PM +0200, Norbert Sendetzky wrote:
> Hi Ken
>
> > That is enough motivation. Please let me know if you have any
> > questions. I would like to have this functionality rolled into
> > PDNS, but it seems that I am one of the few who would take
> > advantage of it. In
Hi Ken
> That is enough motivation. Please let me know if you have any
> questions. I would like to have this functionality rolled into
> PDNS, but it seems that I am one of the few who would take
> advantage of it. In our system it is extremely useful so I will
> continue to post updated versions
Dear PDNS Users:
I have posted this patch previously but would like to post
this new version against 2.9.21. The changes are identical
modulo code positions. Its motivation was initially to reduce
the overhead and performance problems when using PDNS as the
SLAVE DNS server with large domains. Pre
