Hello,
On Jul 8, 2013, at 20:15 , Peter van Dijk wrote:
> Please read
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/afasterinternet/HJD2WphubOg/Lt7GB2Y9deAJ
> , then read the rest of this email.
>
> PowerDNS does not currently support using two option numbers in parallel -
> patches welcome.
>
> As Wlime
Hello,
On Jul 9, 2013, at 13:28 , Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Happy news, PowerDNS has no support for multiple edns subnet option numbers.
> Behaviour has been changed to always support option number 8 (IANA assigment)
> and you can also define list of option numbers to respect as well, the default
> bei
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:21:51AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> Hello Aki,
>
> On Jul 8, 2013, at 21:38 , Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> > Can you please elaborate who should do this and when? Recursor operators?
> > Auth
> > operators?
>
>
> There is no action required from recursor operators. Auth
Hello Aki,
On Jul 8, 2013, at 21:38 , Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Can you please elaborate who should do this and when? Recursor operators? Auth
> operators?
There is no action required from recursor operators. Auth operators that use
edns-client-subnet in a backend need to take action on the to-be-de
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 08:15:57PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please read
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/afasterinternet/HJD2WphubOg/Lt7GB2Y9deAJ
> , then read the rest of this email.
>
> PowerDNS does not currently support using two option numbers in parallel -
> patches welc
Hello,
Please read
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/afasterinternet/HJD2WphubOg/Lt7GB2Y9deAJ
, then read the rest of this email.
PowerDNS does not currently support using two option numbers in parallel -
patches welcome.
As Wlimer's email promises a change-over date, our current advice is to
s
