Re: [Pdns-users] Serial increase not reflecte in database

2022-01-21 Thread Ansgar Wiechers via Pdns-users
On 2022-01-21 Klaus Darilion wrote: >> As far as I'm aware we are not using DNSSEC for the zones in >> question, so anything DNSSEC-related should not be an issue. > > If you do not use DNSSEC then there is no reason to set SOA-EDIT. If > SOA-EDIT-API is set, every change (via PDNS API) increments

Re: [Pdns-users] Serial increase not reflecte in database

2022-01-21 Thread Ansgar Wiechers via Pdns-users
On 2022-01-20 Klaus Darilion wrote: >> Okay, but then what is the appropriate way to get PowerDNS to update >> the SOA record? > > Good question - depends on what you want to achieve. > > Your settings: > SOA-EDIT = INCEPTION-EPOCH > SOA-EDIT-API = SOA-EDIT-INCREASE > TSIG-ALLOW-AXFR = transf

Re: [Pdns-users] Serial increase not reflecte in database

2022-01-20 Thread Ansgar Wiechers via Pdns-users
On 2022-01-20 Klaus Darilion wrote: >> This would normally be fine, but the change seems to occur only in >> the service itself and is not reflected in the SOA record stored in >> the database. > > SOA-Edit does not influence/manipulate the serial in the DB. > SOA-EDIT is used to fake the Serial (o

Re: [Pdns-users] Serial increase not reflecte in database

2022-01-20 Thread Klaus Darilion via Pdns-users
> This would normally be fine, but the change seems to occur only in the > service itself and is not reflected in the SOA record stored in the > database. SOA-Edit does not influence/manipulate the serial in the DB. SOA-EDIT is used to fake the Serial (on outgoing NOTIFYs and responses which cont

[Pdns-users] Serial increase not reflecte in database

2022-01-20 Thread Ansgar Wiechers via Pdns-users
Hello I have a setup running PowerDNS (v4.4.1 on Ubuntu Xenial) as hidden masters with BIND slaves as the authoritative name servers. The metadata of the zones are these: me@localhost:~# pdnsutil get-meta example.org Metadata for 'example.org' SOA-EDIT = INCEPTION-EPOCH SOA-EDIT-API = SOA