I'm in the process of migrating to powerdns to take advantage of the
supermaster/superslave feature in particular (as well as better dnssec
management), with a hidden master architecture to provide additional
security for administration and dnssec private keys. It seems, however,
that for the
Running version 4.1, there is no supermaster setting in the main config
(doc says it added in 4.2) but I understand supermaster feature should
work under 4.1, is that correct?
When migrating to 4.2 what feature does ''supermaster=yes'' add for
having in config file? Must I remove ''master=yes'
Firstly, thank you, Bert, for coming to UKNOF34 and presenting on dnsdist and
powerdns. Really interesting and useful technology.
And for that reason I've been testing out whether powerdns would be a good fit
to replace our scripted BIND servers that do authoritative and DNSSEC.
The idea is to
Hi Aki,
Thanks,
My earlier answer (that worked for me) was originated from:
https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/546
Have a nice day
Momo
--
View this message in context:
http://powerdns.13854.n7.nabble.com/Supermaster-Slaves-Supermaster-has-to-be-a-listed-NS-tp9276p10152.html
Sent from
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 03:25:51AM -0700, ymicromed wrote:
> Hi Aki,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I meant by my post that the 3 slaves ns1, ns2, ns3 didn't accept the
> notification from the SUPERMASTER ns4.
>
> I've had the same situation, and after rectifying the zone on the master
> ns4, it
Hi Aki,
Thanks for your reply.
I meant by my post that the 3 slaves ns1, ns2, ns3 didn't accept the
notification from the SUPERMASTER ns4.
I've had the same situation, and after rectifying the zone on the master
ns4, it worked for me, and slaves started axfr transfer from the
supermaster.
I th
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 01:58:40AM -0700, ymicromed wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To fix this problem, you don't have to add your ns4 to the NS records.
>
> *use the pdnssec utility:*
>
> pdnssec rectify-zone test.com
>
This will not cause domain transfers, sorry :(
If you want to have your domain notifie
Hi,
To fix this problem, you don't have to add your ns4 to the NS records.
*use the pdnssec utility:*
pdnssec rectify-zone test.com
And the ns1, ns2, ns3 will initiate the transfer from ns4 :)
*Here an example:*
% Jul 05 10:34:13 Received NOTIFY for test1.com from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx for
which we
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 03:54:36PM -0700, Gregg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to setup a PDNS server for a while now. I have a local
> setup that seems to work perfectly. Two PDNS server with MySQL replication.
>
> Now I have been trying to get PDNS to act as superslave for a few other
>
Hello,
I've been trying to setup a PDNS server for a while now. I have a local
setup that seems to work perfectly. Two PDNS server with MySQL replication.
Now I have been trying to get PDNS to act as superslave for a few other
servers.
I have configured everything properly, added the supermast
Hello Alex,
On Jan 22, 2013, at 3:35 , ot...@ahhyes.net wrote:
> Firstly, everything appears to be working ok, updates to the slave work fine.
> I am just puzzled by this bizarre way powerdns does things, the first 2 lines
> of "Queued notification" events are queuing notifications to the maste
Hi Guys,
I am seeing some odd entries on my master server logs (same behavior
witnessed in 3.1 and 3.2-rc4).
Log Snippet:
Jan 22 13:01:32 ns pdns[53002]: 1 domain for which we are master needs
notifications
Jan 22 13:01:32 ns pdns[53002]: Queued notification of domain
'example.net' to 2001:
Hi Ed,
Op 26-11-12 17:08, Ed schreef:
Hi,
I've looked through the documentation and searched the archives and
haven't found a concrete answer to this issue:
We have a hidden master that updates slaves that are the internet
facing DNS resolvers, they are not recursive.
We want to use autom
Hi,
I've looked through the documentation and searched the archives and haven't
found a concrete answer to this issue:
We have a hidden master that updates slaves that are the internet facing DNS
resolvers, they are not recursive.
We want to use automatic zone provisioning via the supermaster
I am not certain that this is normal behavior for PowerDNS. Everything seems
to work but it seems like something is wrong.
I have a Windows DNS server that I have configured to automatically notify
this particular PowerDNS server whenever a zone changes. These are existing
domains on the Window
> One reason is that this supports setups of the following type:
> - ns01 is a powerdns machine in slave mode, slaving domains from other
> machines.
> - ns01 stores all slaved zones in a database (MySQL, Oracle, etc.) which is
> replicated to one or more database slaves
> - ns02/ns03 use these
Hello,
On May 24, 2012, at 17:58 , a b wrote:
> Can anyone tell me why this needs to be explicitly set in the
> pdns.conf file, when we have a relational database as the backend
> storage and the database contains all the information required
> for pdns_server to know whether he is to be a
[...]
> I mean the "zones" table; we use the "oracle" backend instead of
Pardon me: I wasn't paying attention.
-JP
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
> > Regarding superslave provisioning, does the pdns.conf on the mas-
> > ter need to have "master=yes" and does the pdns.conf on the slave
> > need to have "slave=yes"
>
> Correct: the master must be a master, and the slave a slave. :) Zones
> are transferred via AXFR.
Can anyone tell me why thi
> Regarding superslave provisioning, does the pdns.conf on the mas-
> ter need to have "master=yes" and does the pdns.conf on the slave
> need to have "slave=yes"
Correct: the master must be a master, and the slave a slave. :) Zones
are transferred via AXFR.
> The documentation mentions all sorts
Regarding superslave provisioning, does the pdns.conf on the mas-
ter need to have "master=yes" and does the pdns.conf on the slave
need to have "slave=yes", or can all of that be configured
directly by doing INSERT statements in the database?
The documentation mentions all sorts of scenar
> I'm remove record from master - can it possible to remove it automatic from
> slave ?
A zone transfer will be initiated by the slave when it detects that the
SOA serial number on the master has increased. At this point, the zone
transfer (AXFR) will "delete" the records on the slave. Your PDNS m
Hello. I'm use pdns on two servers with supermaster mode. When the new
record appeared on master it transfers to slave. But how about deleted
records?
I'm remove record from master - can it possible to remove it automatic from
slave ?
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
Clodo.ru
e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru
jabbe
Hello users,
We are operating a shared hosting server and attempting to setup two
separate authoritative name servers. We chose PowerDNS for this because
of the supermaster functionality. The plan was to have our shared
hosting server (running BIND) set as a supermaster on ns1 (PowerDNS), so
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Kieran Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dig reports "Transfer failed".
> I'm guessing there must be some config issue on DNS1.
> How do I turn debugging on?
http://docs.powerdns.com/all-settings.html
loglevel and query-logging might help.
--
Augie Schwer - [
Dig reports "Transfer failed".
I'm guessing there must be some config issue on DNS1.
How do I turn debugging on?
Augie Schwer wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Kieran Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But I am getting the following errors
May 21 14:39:23 adder pdns[28233]: 1 slave domai
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Kieran Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I am getting the following errors
> May 21 14:39:23 adder pdns[28233]: 1 slave domain needs checking
> May 21 14:39:23 adder pdns[28233]: No serial for '' found - zone
> is missing?
> May 21 14:39:23 adder pdns[28233]:
I've had two DNS servers set up perfectly for a while now.
DNS1 being a supermaster and DNS2 receiving all it's updates from DNS2,
quite straight forward.
I've attempted to setup DNS3 in the same manner as DNS2.
DNS3 is running all the same versions of pdns and mysql (I'm using the
mysql backe
Mathew Hennessy schreef:
Nicholas.Orr wrote:
Hi,
I managed to get supermaster working again. One question though.
Does the server that is supermaster have to be listed in a NS record for
the
zone being delegated to the Slave?
I was hoping I could setup
ns1 - primary - slave
n
Nicholas.Orr wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I managed to get supermaster working again. One question though.
>
> Does the server that is supermaster have to be listed in a NS record for
> the
> zone being delegated to the Slave?
>
> I was hoping I could setup
> ns1 - primary - slave
> ns2 - secondary - s
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Nicholas Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It's just that when I left out ns4 from the ns records for that zone ns2 &
> ns3 complained about not being able to find a backend for this zone from
> supermaster ns4. As soon as I added ns4 as a ns record of the zone and
Sorry about that, didn't use reply to all.
Here's a copy of my settings in table supermasters on the slaves.
+---++--+
| ip | nameserver | account |
+---++--+
| | ns1.yourdomain.com | internal
How come you didn't use the list address.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Nicholas Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ok thanks Ton,
>
> I'll have another go.
> It's just that when I left out ns4 from the ns records for that zone ns2 &
> ns3 complained about not being able to find a backend fo
Hi,
I managed to get supermaster working again. One question though.
Does the server that is supermaster have to be listed in a NS record for the
zone being delegated to the Slave?
I was hoping I could setup
ns1 - primary - slave
ns2 - secondary - slave
ns3 - extra -slave
ns4 - supermaster
With
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:35:48AM +,
Ale * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 59 lines which said:
> Id like to add new zone (records) or modify an existent zone
> (records) and i'd want that this changes are sended to master
...
> Somebody told me that is it impossible because su
> Hello,
> If i have a dns primary server (160.80.1.8) and a secondary dns server
> (160.80.2.4) both use bind9. I'd want to have a third dns server that use
> powerdns (160.80.3.5) only to manage the dns servers that use bind
> (160.80.1.8 , 160.80.2.4) which address i have to insert in the tab
Hello,
If i have a dns primary server (160.80.1.8) and a secondary dns server
(160.80.2.4) both use bind9. I'd want to have a third dns server that use
powerdns (160.80.3.5) only to manage the dns servers that use bind
(160.80.1.8 , 160.80.2.4) which address i have to insert in the table
supe
> Hello to all,
> I'd want to know something about powerDNS. I have 2 DNS server, a
> master and a slave that both use bind. I'd want to have a third dns
> server that use powerDNS. This DNS server that use PowerDNS should be
> like a supermaster. I'll try to explain better. Using a web interface
Hello to all,
I'd want to know something about powerDNS. I have 2 DNS server, a
master and a slave that both use bind. I'd want to have a third dns
server that use powerDNS. This DNS server that use PowerDNS should be
like a supermaster. I'll try to explain better. Using a web interface
for powerD
Can pdns accept a notify from a supermaster and then in turn act
as one?
I'm setting up a nameserver which will have multiple A records
(round robin glue record).
Basically what I'd like to have is one machine in the nameserver
cluster accept a notify from a supermaster. This pdns instance
would
40 matches
Mail list logo
