On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 01:35:59PM +0100,
Leen Besselink wrote
a message of 58 lines which said:
> I would expect it to need authentication tokens too. :-)
In almost all registries, this is allowed only to registered
registrars. So, even if someone were willing to add an EPP client to
PowerDN
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:39:59AM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:24:12AM +0100, Leen Besselink wrote:
>
> > But their is one part I'm missing a way to hook up an EPP-client for
> > sending the DS-record to the parent-zone.
>
> This could be added to pdnssec perhaps - is t
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:24:12AM +0100, Leen Besselink wrote:
> A (possibly hidden) supermaster which does all the DNSSEC signing and
> the superslaves which only do
> zone-trasfers and no online DNSSEC-signing but do understand enough of
> the protocol to be able to serve it.
This scenario is s
On 01/06/2011 08:00 PM, bert hubert wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:55:24AM -0500, Mathew Hennessy wrote:
>> Excellent! BTW, can PowerDNSSEC operate in the following way as one would
>> expect:
>>
>> PowerDNS supermaster which has DNSSEC RRs but doesn't do DNSSEC (aka
>> traditional PowerDNS)
would be an excellent "way into dnssec".
This wouldn't require any change to the existing (non-dnssec) powerdns setups,
and would allow us to test with "real" things, easily migrate single domains to
a dnssec setup (just change the nameservers), rollback when needed to the old
and tested setup
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:55:24AM -0500, Mathew Hennessy wrote:
> Excellent! BTW, can PowerDNSSEC operate in the following way as one would
> expect:
>
> PowerDNS supermaster which has DNSSEC RRs but doesn't do DNSSEC (aka
> traditional PowerDNS) providing data to PowerDNS slaves. If you use t
Dear PowerDNS Community,
With the help of many of you, we've now brought 'PowerDNSSEC' to the point
where it might make sense for you to trial it on test domains. We expect to
make move some of our own important domains over to PowerDNSSEC early next
week. PowerDNS.COM underlies the commercial DN
