On Monday 12 November 2007 23:24:51 Duane wrote:
> I personally hate all the unnecessary abstract layers, yes they are
> useful in providing a one to many interface, but this adds an extra
> layer of complexity, and extra point for bugs to creep in, and an extra
> point of failure.
>
> I've seen th
bert hubert wrote:
> We could merge OpenDBX as the preferred backend of course, and keep the
> generic interface.
I personally hate all the unnecessary abstract layers, yes they are
useful in providing a one to many interface, but this adds an extra
layer of complexity, and extra point for bugs t
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 05:33:58PM +0100, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
> I'm searching for reasons why new PowerDNS users would choose the
> generic Mysql/PostgreSQL (gmysql) backends over the OpenDBX backend,
> apart from the fact that the OpenDBX backend isn't documented at
> doc.powerdns.com.
>
> The f
I'm searching for reasons why new PowerDNS users would choose the
generic Mysql/PostgreSQL (gmysql) backends over the OpenDBX backend,
apart from the fact that the OpenDBX backend isn't documented at
doc.powerdns.com.
The flexibility and marginal performance advantage of the OpenDBX
backend over t
