Hi
On 30/04/2025 09:19, Alessandro Lota via Pdns-users wrote:
> > If a specific reverse zone like a /24 exists, it could have precedence
> > over a /8 during resolution (NOT TESTED!!!).
>
> On the auth server: this will be fine. Many servers host a domain and
> its sub-domains: this is normal prac
On 30/04/2025 09:19, Alessandro Lota via Pdns-users wrote:
If a specific reverse zone like a /24 exists, it could have precedence
over a /8 during resolution (NOT TESTED!!!).
On the auth server: this will be fine. Many servers host a domain and
its sub-domains: this is normal practice.
On th
Hi List
That's a good question — I've never tried creating overlapping .arpa
> domains before.
>
> If a specific reverse zone like a /24 exists, it could have precedence
> over a /8 during resolution (NOT TESTED!!!).
> You might also consider switching to a /16 zone instead of a /8, for more
> pre
On 25/04/25 10:30, rob777 via Pdns-users wrote:
Would this work or will this generate a conflict with the existing
10.0.10.in-addr.arpa, 10.0.20.in-addr.arpa, 10.0.25.in-addr.arpa
Reverse zones? Or will Powerdns Auth. not be able to load this new
reverse zone 10.in-addr.arpa because it overlap
Hi List
I use Powerdns Authoritative with Powerdns Recursor for Internal Zones.
Currently i have 300-400 Subnets in the 10.0.0.0/8 Range. Currently i have
only for 3 Subnets in this Range a Reverse zone configured in my Pdns Auth.
and PDNS Recursor. So i have...
10.0.10.in-addr.arpa
10.0.20.in-ad
