Hi Richard,
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 15:27 +1000, Richard McLean wrote:
> I have wondered about this. We'd love to implement a hidden supermaster type
> setup, using AXFR, which auto-updates the 4 main name servers, but is *not*
> in the list of name servers for a domain and is not publicly availab
On 06 Aug 2010 wk 31, at 09:56, Richard McLean wrote:
>
> On 06/08/2010, at 3:54 PM, Ton van Rosmalen wrote:
>
>> No, this is not a restriction. In our setup we've added the ip address
>> in the supermasters-table like this:
>> +---++--+
>> | ip
On 06/08/2010, at 3:54 PM, Ton van Rosmalen wrote:
> No, this is not a restriction. In our setup we've added the ip address
> in the supermasters-table like this:
> +---++--+
> | ip| nameserver | account |
> +---+---
Hi Richard,
Richard McLean schreef:
> Hi all,
>
>
> From Stefan's answer yesterday on the AXFR question:
>
> On 06/08/2010, at 12:55 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> "The set of NS records for the domain, as retrieved by the slave from the
>> supermaster, must include the name that goes with the
Hi all,
>From Stefan's answer yesterday on the AXFR question:
On 06/08/2010, at 12:55 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> "The set of NS records for the domain, as retrieved by the slave from the
> supermaster, must include the name that goes with the IP address in the
> supermaster table"
I have wond
