On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:28:23 +0100, bert hubert wrote:
[...]
> Ideas?
>
> I prefer a solution where we don't actually increment the serial in the
> database but overlay it with something that autoincrements ('weeks since
> january first 2011').
I actually like that idea - guess that would work for
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 08:44:08AM +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
> I kind of expected this to happen today - the master (ns.cmeerw.net)
> with the keying material has now updated the RRSIG records, but the
> slave (ns2.cmeerw.net, no keying material) still returns the old RRSIG
> records:
Indeed
Hi,
I kind of expected this to happen today - the master (ns.cmeerw.net)
with the keying material has now updated the RRSIG records, but the
slave (ns2.cmeerw.net, no keying material) still returns the old RRSIG
records:
; <<>> DiG 9.7.1-P2 <<>> +dnssec -t soa cmeerw.priv.at @ns.cmeerw.net
;; ANS