Hi,
On 4/6/21 6:25 PM, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users wrote:
On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 10:04 AM, Remi Gacogne wrote:
On 4/6/21 4:18 PM, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users wrote:
Would additional distributor threads really cause additional
worker
CPU usage?
That could happen if they have to fight for
On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 10:04 AM, Remi Gacogne wrote:
> On 4/6/21 4:18 PM, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users wrote:
> > Would additional distributor threads really cause additional worker
> CPU usage?
>
> That could happen if they have to fight for the incoming socket. Do you
> have reuseport=yes in
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 02:18:33PM +, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users wrote:
> Both 4.4/5 and proxy protocol were on my radar, but my priority was to
> address the CPU usage. If there's performance gains to be had in upgrading,
> I can certainly do that. Is 4.5GA likely to happen soon?
expec
On 4/6/21 4:18 PM, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users wrote:
Would additional distributor threads really cause additional worker CPU usage?
That could happen if they have to fight for the incoming socket. Do you
have reuseport=yes in your configuration?
Does the maintenance function block the wor
On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 3:32 AM, Remi Gacogne wrote:
> On 4/6/21 8:35 AM, Otto Moerbeek via Pdns-users wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 05:30:11PM +, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users
> wrote:
> > 2 distributior thread feels a bit overkill, 1 distributor thread
> > should be able to feed 8 wor
Hi,
On 4/6/21 8:35 AM, Otto Moerbeek via Pdns-users wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 05:30:11PM +, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users wrote:
Some thoughts:
2 distributior thread feels a bit overkill, 1 distributor thread
should be able to feed 8 workers. Did you do measurements to come to
this val
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 05:30:11PM +, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users wrote:
Some thoughts:
2 distributior thread feels a bit overkill, 1 distributor thread
should be able to feed 8 workers. Did you do measurements to come to
this value?
Your maintenance function looks like it could run for a w
On Monday, April 5, 2021 10:05 AM, Otto Moerbeek Wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 02:40:17PM +, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users
> wrote:
>
> > We recently replaced some Bind servers with PowerDNS recursor, and
> > were rather surprised to see CPU usage essentially double for the same
> > workload
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 02:40:17PM +, Nejedlo, Mark via Pdns-users wrote:
> We recently replaced some Bind servers with PowerDNS recursor, and were
> rather surprised to see CPU usage essentially double for the same workload.
> My expectation was that the load would be more or less equivale
We recently replaced some Bind servers with PowerDNS recursor, and were rather
surprised to see CPU usage essentially double for the same workload. My
expectation was that the load would be more or less equivalent between the two
resolvers. It looks like the load is centered in the actual pdns
10 matches
Mail list logo
