Re: [Pdns-users] BIND-Zonefiles: @ vs blank

On 08/08/2019 14:09, Michael Loftis wrote: we have a zonefile which got recently added TXT entries for SPF and DMARC: _dmarc          IN      TXT     "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:foo "                 IN      MX      10 mx.domain.tld.                 IN     

Re: [Pdns-users] BIND-Zonefiles: @ vs blank

Hey, > > I've always had the understanding that blank meant "reuse last" so by > adding the _dmarc TXT record ahead of the blank records you > inadvertently moved them to be _dmarc.ZONE > > I could certainly be wrong because I haven't looked at the man page for > bind zone files in the last deca

Re: [Pdns-users] BIND-Zonefiles: @ vs blank

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 07:01 Bjoern Franke wrote: > Hi, > > we have a zonefile which got recently added TXT entries for SPF and DMARC: > > _dmarc IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:foo"; > IN MX 10 mx.domain.tld. > IN TXT "v=s

[Pdns-users] BIND-Zonefiles: @ vs blank

Hi, we have a zonefile which got recently added TXT entries for SPF and DMARC: _dmarc IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:foo"; IN MX 10 mx.domain.tld. IN TXT "v=spf1 include:spf1.domain.tld ?all" Since then, requests for the