Re: [Pdns-users] pdns << free-ipa with external dns

2017-02-23 Thread stancs3
tc. OK, now I am stepping back .  :) . On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 08:58 +, Brian Candler wrote: > > > On 23/02/2017 03:25, stancs3 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I am setting up free-ipa with an > > *> >

[Pdns-users] pdns << free-ipa with external dns

2017-02-22 Thread stancs3
This starts as a free-ipa subject but ends in a pdns question, with some in-addr.arpa delegation mysteries. I am setting up free-ipa with an *external* dns server, ns1.example.com. (ref: Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-7- Linux_Domain_Identity_Authentication_and_Policy_Guide-en-US.pdf; Section 2.3.4 Ins

[Pdns-users] pdns 'native replication'

2017-02-20 Thread stancs3
With ref to pdns documentation, 'native replication' is defined as replication that is taken care of by the backend sql db replication. One then refers to the pdns servers as primary/secondary and not master/slave. There no zone transfers etc. I have this set up and working via postgresql replicat

[Pdns-users] [Fwd: Re: DiG: Hopefully Final Thoughts..]

2017-02-19 Thread stancs3
Sorry meant to reply all Forwarded Message From: stancs3 To: Brian Candler Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] DiG: Hopefully Final Thoughts.. Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 17:37:33 -0700 After a bunch of testing etc: The reverse now works; like you indicated it's just another

Re: [Pdns-users] DiG: Hopefully Final Thoughts..

2017-02-17 Thread stancs3
, given the support of this forum. Stan On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 08:15 +, Brian Candler wrote: > On 17/02/2017 06:45, stancs3 wrote: > > > > Reverse doesn't work in this config, so I figure on giving up on > > recursor. > What do you mean by "reverse does

[Pdns-users] DiG: Hopefully Final Thoughts..

2017-02-16 Thread stancs3
to keep it clean. Wouldn't that be the same/better than the router's? That's it for now. Thanks, if you read these emails. Stan On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 23:10 -0700, stancs3 wrote: > OK, I managed to get DiG to respond with A records, but only by > specifying the hostname in from

Re: [Pdns-users] DiG: more success but puzzling

2017-02-16 Thread stancs3
. I won't send any more emails tonight unless I have a major breakthru. stna On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 22:56 -0700, stancs3 wrote: > Well, I managed to reverse the servers, and get them working. > > DiG now works for +trace. > > The auth server also seems to be working. > &g

Re: [Pdns-users] DiG _trace: no response, no fail, nothing

2017-02-16 Thread stancs3
nameserver seems to still work, as I can ping at the client level using the host name that is defined in the A record in the auth server. Not sure if this is pointing to another problem, or it is simply working. Stan On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 21:40 -0700, stancs3 wrote: > Thanks for the quick re

Re: [Pdns-users] DiG _trace: no response, no fail, nothing

2017-02-16 Thread stancs3
at 21:04 -0700, David wrote: > On 2017-02-16 6:29 PM, stancs3 wrote: > > > > I have seen this problem posted in various places over the years. > > It is > > not clear if it is a bug, a bad config, or just non-functional. > > https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns

[Pdns-users] DiG _trace: no response, no fail, nothing

2017-02-16 Thread stancs3
I have seen this problem posted in various places over the years. It is not clear if it is a bug, a bad config, or just non-functional. My set up: VM running Centos 7, up to date. pdns install using postgresql db. pdns-recursor install. pdns is running as an authoritive ns, standalone, replicate