able
from our repository [7].
[1]: https://dnsdist.org
[2]: https://dnsdist.org/changelog.html#change-2.0.0
[3]: https://dnsdist.org/upgrade_guide.html
[4]: https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/new/choose
[5]:
https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/dnsdist-2.0.0.tar.xz
[6]:
https:/
l#change-5.0.12
5. https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/changelog/5.1.html#change-5.1.6
6. https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/changelog/5.2.html#change-5.2.4
7. https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
8. https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/new/choose
downloads website, and packages for several distributions are available
from our repository [7].
[1]: https://dnsdist.org
[2]: https://dnsdist.org/changelog.html#change-2.0.0-rc2
[3]: https://dnsdist.org/upgrade_guide.html
[4]: https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/new/choose
[5]:
https
/changelog/5.3.html#change-5.3.0-alpha2
3. https://docs.powerdns.com/recursor/upgrade.html
4. https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
5. https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/new/choose
6. https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-recursor-5.3.0-alpha2.tar.xz
7
://dnsdist.org/changelog.html#change-2.0.0-rc1
[3]: https://dnsdist.org/upgrade_guide.html
[4]: https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/new/choose
[5]:
https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/dnsdist-2.0.0-rc1.tar.xz
[6]:
https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/dnsdist-2.0.0-rc1.tar.xz.sig
[7]: https
ative/upgrading.html
3. https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-4.9.7.tar.bz2
4. https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-4.9.7.tar.bz2.sig
5. https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/
6. https://repo.powerdns.com/
7. https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
8. https://github.com/Pow
Good afternoon, powerdns team!
We use pdns recursor with a five-minute value set in the settings for the
minimum_ttl_override field.
However, recently there have been problems with Content Delivery Network
providers using dns balancing, so it became necessary to redefine the value of
the
://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/changelog/5.3.html#change-5.3.0-alpha1
3. https://docs.powerdns.com/recursor/upgrade.html
4. https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
5. https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/new/choose
6. https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-recursor-5.3.0
"
or something along those lines?
Steinar Haug, AS2116
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
]: https://dnsdist.org
[2]: https://dnsdist.org/changelog.html#change-2.0.0-beta1
[3]: https://dnsdist.org/upgrade_guide.html
[4]: https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/new/choose
[5]:
https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/dnsdist-2.0.0-beta1.tar.xz
[6]:
https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 04:56:14PM +0200, Jan-Piet Mens via Pdns-users wrote:
> > rec_control add-nta domain.example botched keyroll
> >
> > would set dnssec validations for domain.example. to "off"?
>
> Correct, though the multple arguments as rea
uments.
-JP
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
. Juni 2025 um 16:21 Uhr schrieb Jan-Piet Mens via Pdns-users <
pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com>:
> I think the safest in this situation would be to add a Negative Trust
> Anchor
> (NTA) [1] in order to temporarily disable DNSSEC validation in your
> Recursor
> for that particular
authoritative server and
get them to fix the zone.
-JP
[1] https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/lua-config/dnssec.html#addNTA
[2] https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/dnssec.html#ntas
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https
Hi
I had a case where a customer who is using my pdns recursor for external
domain resolution had an application error due to failed dnssec validation
for the external Domain which his application depends on. I have
dnssec=validate configured in pdns recursor
The external domain had 4 Auth. DNS
On Wednesday, 4 June 2025 at 23:42, Ken Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 06:11:02PM +, Smith via Pdns-users wrote:
>
> > Subject says it all really.
> >
> > I've got a pdns-auth server currently talking to a postgres backend.
> >
> > I
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 06:11:02PM +, Smith via Pdns-users wrote:
> Subject says it all really.
>
> I've got a pdns-auth server currently talking to a postgres backend.
>
> I want to migrate the postgres backend to a different server (new version of
> postgres).
>
Subject says it all really.
I've got a pdns-auth server currently talking to a postgres backend.
I want to migrate the postgres backend to a different server (new version of
postgres).
Are there any special steps / considerations required to avoid breaking DNSSEC
along the way ? I gue
ame with the gmysql backend? Or is
there a backend that could do that for me (like some kind of alias backend
where one can configure a list of domains and a target domain to fetch
records from)?
I can't get rid of the bind backend if it results in having to edit 5k
domains on a single record cha
Thanks, was able to get a working configuration to get started with. I did not
see that previously
May 23, 2025 7:46:42 AM Otto Moerbeek :
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:38:07AM -0400, Eric via Pdns-users wrote:
>
>> Having some trouble finding documentation and examples of u
Hi Christoph,
On 5/27/25 11:33, Christoph via Pdns-users wrote:
These crashes continued on an almost daily basis until we updated to
1.9.9 in early May, since then we have never seen a dnsdist crash.
So maybe it was related to CVE-2025-30194 or some other changes in 1.9.9
after all, not sure
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
horitative/upgrading.html
3. https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-5.0.0-alpha1.tar.bz2
4. https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-5.0.0-alpha1.tar.bz2.sig
5. https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/
6. https://repo.powerdns.com/
7. https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/lis
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:38:07AM -0400, Eric via Pdns-users wrote:
> Having some trouble finding documentation and examples of using lau2 to
> answer dns requests.
>
> Was able to use bind and gsqlite3 as backends for powerdns and they answer
> queries but have not had any
/upgrade_guide.html
[4]: https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/new/choose
[5]:
https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/dnsdist-2.0.0-alpha2.tar.xz
[6]:
https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/dnsdist-2.0.0-alpha2.tar.xz.sig
[7]: https://repo.powerdns.com
Best regards,
--
Remi Gacogne
PowerDNS.COM BV - https
nt to have it answer a single query of any
kind with lau2 as the backend.
Does anyone have examples of minimal configs for pdns.conf and an associated
lau2-filename script? Documentation or tutorial examples?
Thanks
___
Pdns-users mailing list
://dnsdist.org
[2]: https://dnsdist.org/changelog.html#change-1.9.10
[3]: https://dnsdist.org/upgrade_guide.html
[4]: https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/new/choose
[5]:
https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/dnsdist-1.9.10.tar.bz2
[6]:
https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/dnsdist-1.9.10.tar.bz2.sig
Geurts
> On 12 May 2025, at 15:28, pdns-users-requ...@mailman.powerdns.com wrote:
>
> Send Pdns-users mailing list submissions to
> pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailma
hanks for
your help and assume this request is closed.
Regards
Robby
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 03:00:37PM +0100, Robby Pedrica wrote:
On 2025/04/30 12:41, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 03:18:44PM +0100, Robby Pedrica via Pdns-users wrote:
Hi pdns community
I've got an
Question Djerk: why are you running your firewalls in active/active?
This is an unusual configuration that has many challenges, including the
one you've just mentioned.
Regards
Robby
On 2025/05/12 15:04, Djerk Geurts via Pdns-users wrote:
An odd statement possibly, but I’m looking for
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
Hi
On 30/04/2025 09:19, Alessandro Lota via Pdns-users wrote:
> > If a specific reverse zone like a /24 exists, it could have precedence
> > over a /8 during resolution (NOT TESTED!!!).
>
> On the auth server: this will be fine. Many servers host a domain and
> its sub-do
eek wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 03:18:44PM +0100, Robby Pedrica via Pdns-users
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi pdns community
> > >
> > > I've got an odd issue where some clients do not get a response from either
> > > of my 2 recursor
On 2025/04/30 12:41, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 03:18:44PM +0100, Robby Pedrica via Pdns-users wrote:
Hi pdns community
I've got an odd issue where some clients do not get a response from either
of my 2 recursors. Both are v5.1.4 deployed via docker with fairly std
co
configuration forwards to
> the
> > private AD servers and I believe the lua script drops queries that have
> no
> > match in that zone. The public zone is being slowly phased out.
> >
> > I noted while reviewing the previous server configs and found a comment
> >
is why this configuration worked perfectly for
> me with one old version of PDNS- pdns-4.1.14-1 (only put two namesever
> in resolv.conf 127.0.0.1 and 8.8.8.8) ?
Please see
https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/appendices/EOL.html?highlight=end%20life.
Pdns 4.1 went End Of Life before
"How do I do this really bad thing with
PowerDNS, in order to achieve Y?" when we don't know what Y actually is.___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
ts to
> servidor1.dominio.com <http://servidor1.dominio.com/>, it must resolve to a
> different IP: diripservidor1-serverB.
>
Yes, Pdns-auth with LUA records (in MySQL or other) are a good solution for
this. That's not the issue.
> So, depending on the source of the DNS query, th
Hi Nacho,
How "static" is the list of domains which need to resolve locally? Updated
sub-second? Once every minute? Once every hour?
I would not use pdns-recursor at all. I would let dnsdist be the first point of
entry, with 2 pools: a "auth" pool and a resolver pool.
Add
, and I don't really understand how it did it.
4. Should a Computer Science assignment really be this high-level?
They proposed it to me and I thought it wouldn't be as complicated as it's
turning out to be.
Nacho.
El mié, 7 may 2025 a las 10:27, William Edwards via Pdns
.html#change-4.9.5
2. https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/upgrading.html
3. https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-4.9.5.tar.bz2
4. https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-4.9.5.tar.bz2.sig
5. https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/
6. https://repo.powerdns.com/
7
On 07/05/2025 09:04, Nacho Oppo via Pdns-users wrote:
The goal is to configure PowerDNS so that it first checks an A record
in a MySQL backend, and if the record is not found o if database
does´not respond, it should forward the query to an external DNS
server, such as Google’s (8.8.8.8
10:04 heeft Nacho Oppo via Pdns-users
> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
> Dear "PowerDNS MailGroup",
>
> My name is Nacho, and I am a university student currently studying Computer
> Science. I’m working on my final-year project, which involves setting up a
> On 7 May 2025, at 10:04, Nacho Oppo via Pdns-users
> wrote:
>
> The goal is to configure PowerDNS so that it first checks an A record in a
> MySQL backend, and if the record is not found o if database does´not respond,
> it should forward the query to an external D
to a complete example, I would be truly grateful.
Thank you in advance for your time and help.
Best regards,
Nacho
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 03:18:44PM +0100, Robby Pedrica via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi pdns community
>
> I've got an odd issue where some clients do not get a response from either
> of my 2 recursors. Both are v5.1.4 deployed via docker with fairly std
> configs. Generally the l
On 30/04/2025 09:19, Alessandro Lota via Pdns-users wrote:
If a specific reverse zone like a /24 exists, it could have precedence
over a /8 during resolution (NOT TESTED!!!).
On the auth server: this will be fine. Many servers host a domain and
its sub-domains: this is normal practice.
On
instead of a /8, for more
> precise control.
>
Thank you for the input - seems no way around of testing it with regards
to overlapping domains..
Yes - maybe a /16 zone is better than /8, have to think about that
Best Regards
___
Pdn
On 25/04/25 10:30, rob777 via Pdns-users wrote:
Would this work or will this generate a conflict with the existing
10.0.10.in-addr.arpa, 10.0.20.in-addr.arpa, 10.0.25.in-addr.arpa
Reverse zones? Or will Powerdns Auth. not be able to load this new
reverse zone 10.in-addr.arpa because it
Hi pdns community
I've got an odd issue where some clients do not get a response from
either of my 2 recursors. Both are v5.1.4 deployed via docker with
fairly std configs. Generally the logs will indicate if something is not
in the allowed-from list but these clients don't show
downloads website, and packages for several distributions are available
from our repository [7].
[1]: https://dnsdist.org
[2]: https://dnsdist.org/changelog.html#change-1.9.9
[3]: https://dnsdist.org/upgrade_guide.html
[4]: https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/new/choose
[5]:
https
Hi List
I use Powerdns Authoritative with Powerdns Recursor for Internal Zones.
Currently i have 300-400 Subnets in the 10.0.0.0/8 Range. Currently i have
only for 3 Subnets in this Range a Reverse zone configured in my Pdns Auth.
and PDNS Recursor. So i have...
10.0.10.in-addr.arpa
10.0.20.in
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
add a mention to the documentation, that this feature is not
compatible with group replication.
Miod
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
p-replication and it is in fact
ok to use then?
--
Thank you.
Fabian S.
OpenPGP: 0x643082042DC83E6D94B86C405E3DAA18A1C22D8F
OpenPGP_0x5E3DAA18A1C22D8F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
hello,
On 4/24/25 2:57 AM, Miod Vallat via Pdns-users wrote:
You are not using zone2sql correctly
ahh, understood. i re-read the docs and yep, i see that now. misread it.
thank you. i'll come back to this if needed later. unless this turns out
to be the only way possible somehow.
--
"enable foreign keys" script.
HTH,
Miod
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
On 4/24/25 1:52 AM, Miod Vallat via Pdns-users wrote:
There should be a more detailed error in the group replication plugin
logs, can you check what error gets reported there?
there is an error:
2025-04-24T15:27:41.272419Z 1861 [ERROR] [MY-011543] [Repl] Plugin
group_replication reported
it was the sanitization of the records as
they came over as we had a bunch of really old records in zones (from
the 90s).
In brief the method we used was:
* Create all zones as secondaries in pdns, with your bind as primary:
pdnsutil create-secondary-zone
* convert to native when ready
they came over as we had a bunch of really old records in zones (from the
90s).
In brief the method we used was:
* Create all zones as secondaries in pdns, with your bind as primary:
pdnsutil create-secondary-zone
* convert to native when ready: pdnsutil set-kind native
You could also do this in
Re,
2.> zone2sql --named-conf= --gmysql | mysql -u powerdns -p
powerdns
You are not using zone2sql correctly. You should not pass it a bind zone
file, but rather the named.conf bind configuration which references your
zone file.
HTH,
Miod
___
P
you didn't literally mean to attach the file
itself and instead wanted something else. please advise.
That's fine. I will have a look at it shortly.
Thanks,
Miod
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powe
hello,
On 4/24/25 12:44 AM, Miod Vallat via Pdns-users wrote:
The PowerDNS mysql database schema is currently not compatible with
mysql group replication. You will need to disable this feature for
PowerDNS to work.
that's a bummer. may i ask, what you you then recommend for syncin
Hello,
[...]
> mysql wise, the 2 servers are replicating their data using mysql group
replication. pdns itself is NOT doing anything primary -vs- secondary;
they're just going to host native zones.
error from attempt 1:
Apr 23 20:48:38 [bindbackend] Done parsing domains, 0 rejected,
hello pdns world,
i've been here before but it's been many years, and i certainly did it
differently back then and now i'm stuck again;
i have 2 servers, intended to be a pair of authoritative dns servers.
they both match these general specs:
Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
pdns-server 4.
Jason Tremblett via Pdns-users writes:
> We are having issues with the way that QNAME minimization works and would
> like to know if there is a way to improve our process to resolve
> the issue.
>
> Backend: postgresql DB
> Frontend: authoritative server
> DNSSEC Enabled w
of a smaller
zone with less records the potential to get a NXDOMAIN for a non-cached entry
could occur between the load-zone and rectify-zone (although obviously the
window would be smaller).
Thanks for your input!
Jason Tremblett
___
Pdns-users mailing li
ervers and I believe the lua script drops queries that have no
> match in that zone. The public zone is being slowly phased out.
>
> I noted while reviewing the previous server configs and found a comment
> about this value but no context for the specific reasoning. This may
> exp
/github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/6186
max-negative-ttl=0
/etc/pdns-recursor/recursor.conf
---
dnssec:
validation: validate
incoming:
allow_from:
- 127.0.0.1/8
- 10.0.0.0/8
- 172.16.0.0/12
- 192.168.0.0/16
- 'fd00::/8'
- '2607:B600::/32'
l
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 08:28:48AM -0400, Scott Crace via Pdns-users wrote:
Hi,
Please include your config. That said:
You seem to have pretty low cache hit ratio, a high number of outgoing
queries. How is your cache configged?
Also some throttling is going on. I suspect rec has trouble
Hello all,
Long time lurker on the message list and would like some performance
and/or tuning advice.
We've been using pdns-recursor as internal recursive nameservers for quite
some time now.
The original implementer of pdns departed and I was recently tasked with
replacing or upgrading a
On 11/04/2025 15:38, Curtis Maurand wrote:
https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/running.html
That documentation is for PDNS Authoritative. I believe you were talking
about PDNS Recursor, which is a different piece of software.
Source release tarballs for both can be found here:
https
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:44:57PM -0400, Curtis Maurand via Pdns-users wrote:
> the sysv script is not in the current debian packages and hasn’t been for the
> last few versions and the pdns-recursor installation script will delete the
> existing sysv script. this has been true
/YFDVVY3JNYRGSS5ZBDPTPZLFY4E4FNMO/
2. https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/changelog/5.0.html#change-5.0.10
3. https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/changelog/5.1.html#change-5.1.4
4. https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/changelog/5.2.html#change-5.2.2
5. https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
the sysv script is not in the current debian packages and hasn’t been for the
last few versions and the pdns-recursor installation script will delete the
existing sysv script. this has been true since 4.9.
The docs say that the sysv script is in the source tarball, but it’s not there.
It
On 10/04/2025 14:16, Curtis Maurand via Pdns-users wrote:
I know that powerdns has dropped support for systems that don't run
systemd
Citation Needed™. There is optional systemd integration, but AFAICS it
is not required:
https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/appendices/compiling
Hello,
I have successfully installed pdns-recursor on a non-systemd equipped
system. I know that powerdns has dropped support for systems that don't
run systemd, but I wanted to get this on record for others that like
powerdns, but don't use systemd.
By default the new ve
AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H&version=3.1
3. https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/changelog/5.2.html#change-5.2.1
4. https://docs.powerdns.com/recursor/upgrade.html
5. https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
6. https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/new/choose
Hi,
Perfect. Thanks.
OA
la 5.4.2025 klo 8.36 Otto Moerbeek (o...@drijf.net) kirjoitti:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 09:25:04PM +0300, Olli Attila via Pdns-users wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think setting the RD flag in dnsdist using
> https://www.dnsdist.org/reference/dq.html?highlight=
RD(dq)
dq.dh:setRD(true)
return DNSAction.None -- process further rules
end
addAction(NotRule(RDRule()), LuaAction(setRD))
-Otto
>
> Cheers,
> OA
>
> la 5. huhtik. 2025 klo 8.36 Otto Moerbeek kirjoitti:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 09:25:04PM +0300, Olli Attila
at 09:25:04PM +0300, Olli Attila via Pdns-users wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think setting the RD flag in dnsdist using
> https://www.dnsdist.org/reference/dq.html?highlight=rd#DNSHeader:setRD
> on the requests forwarded to the recursor should work and get you the
> old behaviour back.
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 09:25:04PM +0300, Olli Attila via Pdns-users wrote:
Hi,
I think setting the RD flag in dnsdist using
https://www.dnsdist.org/reference/dq.html?highlight=rd#DNSHeader:setRD
on the requests forwarded to the recursor should work and get you the
old behaviour back. I don&#
Hello all,
After upgrading from dns-recursor 4.8.x -> 5.2.0 I noticed this happened:
Recursor 4.9.x changelog (4.9.0-alpha1 Improvements):
"Change the way RD=0 forwarded queries are handled.
References: pull request 12425 <https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/pull/12425>
"
are available
from our repository [7].
[1]: https://dnsdist.org
[2]: https://dnsdist.org/changelog.html#change-2.0.0-alpha1
[3]: https://dnsdist.org/upgrade_guide.html
[4]: https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/new/choose
[5]:
https://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/dnsdist-2.0.0-alpha1.tar.xz
[6]:
http
elp
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
This was posted a half hour ago, and is probably related:
https://status.linode.com/incidents/m2l4nhd0zyvv
-Doug
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 9:59 AM rob777 via Pdns-users <
pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have posted this on /r/dns too - maybe someone here kn
On 13/03/2025 14:59, rob777 via Pdns-users wrote:
#
My Powerdns Recursor cant resolve stuff from the NS Servers
ns1.linode.com <http://ns1.linode.com/> , ns2.linode.com
<http://ns2.linode.com/>, ns3.linode.com <http://ns3.linode.com/>
#
You starting point should b
Debug Log of my recursor says Server Failure for alpinelinux.org (the
same for others domain NS hosted at these linode NS Servers:
2025-03-13T12:38:17.346381+01:00 top-dnsslave-01 pdns-recursor[1048606]:
[816] QM alpinelinux.org: Step3 Final resolve: Server Failure/0
I cant open an Support Ti
uthoritative servers. Better fix your UDP connectivity.
-Otto
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 09:10:59AM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming via Pdns-users wrote:
> I don't think there are any configuration options in the recursor do to this,
> so you'll have to do it in a firewall system
I don't think there are any configuration options in the recursor do to this,
so you'll have to do it in a firewall system outside of the recursor. Blocking
all outbound traffic to UDP port 53 would take care of it.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, at 06:45, Carlos N via Pdns-users wrote:
&
to do this or if it is even possible.
Documentation doesn't give any clue.
Kind regards and thanks in advance.
Carlos
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
ozo)
> wrote:
>
> 8bit-dns=yes
> api=yes
> api-key=changeme
> cache-ttl=20
> config-dir=/etc/pdns
> daemon=yes
> default-api-rectify=yes
> default-ksk-algorithm=ecdsa256
> default-ksk-size=0
> default-ttl=3600
> direct-dnskey=yes
> disable-axfr=yes
> distr
8bit-dns=yes
api=yes
api-key=changeme
cache-ttl=20
config-dir=/etc/pdns
daemon=yes
default-api-rectify=yes
default-ksk-algorithm=ecdsa256
default-ksk-size=0
default-ttl=3600
direct-dnskey=yes
disable-axfr=yes
distributor-threads=3
dname-processing=yes
dnssec-key-cache-ttl=30
dnsupdate=yes
domain
sorry for the bandwidth: pdnsutil rectify-zone
On 2/27/25 09:47, Curtis Maurand via Pdns-users wrote:
I can't type: pdnsutil rectify
Cheers,
Curtis
On 2/27/25 09:46, Curtis Maurand via Pdns-users wrote:
Is the domain signed? Did you run pdnsutil rectivy ?
On 2/27/25 06:58,
I can't type: pdnsutil rectify
Cheers,
Curtis
On 2/27/25 09:46, Curtis Maurand via Pdns-users wrote:
Is the domain signed? Did you run pdnsutil rectivy ?
On 2/27/25 06:58, Peter Zoltan Keresztes (zozo) via Pdns-users wrote:
I have reinstalled the pdns exported the zones to csv
Is the domain signed? Did you run pdnsutil rectivy ?
On 2/27/25 06:58, Peter Zoltan Keresztes (zozo) via Pdns-users wrote:
I have reinstalled the pdns exported the zones to csv files and
readied the used one using pdnsutil however when I try to save
sometimes I am getting the same errors
e:
>>
>> Try increasing max_allowed_packet in your mysqld config, see if that helps...
>>
>>
>> Frank
>>
>>> On 27 Feb 2025, at 15:10, Peter Zoltan Keresztes (zozo) via Pdns-users
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is really strange
Just did that increased it to 128M no change whatsoever.
Peter
> On 27 Feb 2025, at 16:22, fr...@kiwazo.be wrote:
>
> Try increasing max_allowed_packet in your mysqld config, see if that helps...
>
>
> Frank
>
>> On 27 Feb 2025, at 15:10, Peter Zoltan Kere
Try increasing max_allowed_packet in your mysqld config, see if that helps...
Frank
> On 27 Feb 2025, at 15:10, Peter Zoltan Keresztes (zozo) via Pdns-users
> wrote:
>
> This is really strange situation.
> I have the list of records added to the domain. I can check pdnsuti
1 - 100 of 2462 matches
Mail list logo
