On 06/08/2010, at 3:54 PM, Ton van Rosmalen wrote:
> No, this is not a restriction. In our setup we've added the ip address
> in the supermasters-table like this:
> +---++--+
> | ip| nameserver | account |
> +---+---
Hi all,
>From Stefan's answer yesterday on the AXFR question:
On 06/08/2010, at 12:55 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> "The set of NS records for the domain, as retrieved by the slave from the
> supermaster, must include the name that goes with the IP address in the
> supermaster table"
I have wond
On 07/04/2008, at 5:11 PM, Andrew Wade wrote:
PowerDNS monitor gives: Apr 07 08:40:56 Authoritative empty NO ERROR
to 127.0.0.1 for 'domain.com' (#48), other types do exist
Am I not storing the record correctly in the MySQL table?
Sorry if its something blatantly obvious.
Pretty sure you sho
At 10:01 PM +0200 12/9/07, bert hubert wrote:
Hehe - we had this discussion some time ago and then the conclusion was
the exact reverse, that people did not appreciate the DNS 'feature' of
expiring a domain in case of the master being unavailable.
For PowerDNS, implementing this requires actual
At 12:51 PM -0700 12/9/07, Augie Schwer wrote:
Alternatively Bind seems to note the non-authoritative answer from its
master and add the domain into a some list (neg. cache, etc.) and not
answer authoritatively for it.
Am I wrong in thinking this is a problem?
No, I'd say it sounds like a pro
Hi All,
If you are concerned about this behavior then please make yourself
known; because if I am the only one that thinks this is a problem then
I certainly don't expect it to get fixed any time soon.
Certainly sounds like a painful one with possibly serious side-effects for
the domains usi
At 4:38 PM +0100 25/2/07, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
Some time ago[1] I reported wrong behaviour of pdns regarding existing
domains that have no resource records attached.
Powerdns reports such domains as non-existing. At first the problem
was denied, later it was difficult to fix and conside
At 3:40 PM -0700 21/2/07, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
BTW...the --enable-recursor option is hopelessly broken on Solaris
10/OpenSolaris. We don't need it, but I thought I'd mention it.
The recursor is a separate product now though, no? I don't think
that --enable-recursor should be used with
At 7:33 AM +0200 22/8/06, Richard Mayhew - Nashua Broadband wrote:
Another option is to follow the route I took, where you can add an
additional field in to the database table, for a status of the domain.
I did send out an example config etc, some time ago on the list..
So you did, many thank
At 6:47 PM +0200 21/8/06, bert hubert wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:42:30AM +1000, Richard McLean wrote:
> I know it's possible to set it to resolve to a bogus IP, but I'd like
for it to give an NXDOMAIN rather than that. Is that possible?
Interesting idea!
An entirely emp
Hi All,
Not sure if this is a wacky idea or not, but I was wondering if
it's possible to add a domain to our DNS to make it NOT resolve?
I know it's possible to set it to resolve to a bogus IP, but I'd like
for it to give an NXDOMAIN rather than that. Is that possible?
cheers,
Richard
11 matches
Mail list logo
