Re: [Pdns-users] pipe-abi-version

2017-04-13 Thread Patrick Domack
Must have been something in 4.0.2 I hadn't upgraded the server I was testing on, after upgrading it to 4.0.3, it worked fine. Quoting Patrick Domack : I was updating my pipe backend and notice there are now abi levels. Updated my script to handle abi level 3, and then noticed pow

[Pdns-users] pipe-abi-version

2017-04-13 Thread Patrick Domack
I was updating my pipe backend and notice there are now abi levels. Updated my script to handle abi level 3, and then noticed powerdns failed to start due to known config option pipe-abi-version. https://doc.powerdns.com/md/authoritative/backend-pipe/#pipebackend-protocol I am running powe

Re: [Pdns-users] Problems with PowerDNS

2015-11-10 Thread Patrick Domack
I suppose sense you have dnssec=yes, you are using dnssec, This will cause a lot of sql queries. pdns is using 100% cpu of a single core, did you try adjusting receiver-threads >1 probably for that box set it to 4 and test, maybe higher even. Since I don't know much about what your pdns s

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS recursor Dual Stack

2011-07-25 Thread Patrick Domack
Why should I? it's working perfectly, and that sysctl is already set to 0 Quoting Brielle : sysctl -a | grep v6only If the resulting sysctl is set to 1, then change to 0. -- Brielle (sent from my iPhone) On Jul 25, 2011, at 7:48 AM, Patrick Domack wrote: My powerdns recursor v3

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS recursor Dual Stack

2011-07-25 Thread Patrick Domack
My powerdns recursor v3.3 on ipv4 and ipv6 works fine on linux. Binding to local-address to only ::1 and it doesn't respond to 127.0.0.1 though. Quoting bert hubert : On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:34:29PM -0700, Chris Hesselrode wrote: I've disabled iptables and ip6tables, and get the same r

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low performance !!!URGENT!!!!

2011-02-06 Thread Patrick Domack
I'm not having this issue, can't seem to reproduce it on my system. Stock ubuntu 10.04, with powerdns recursor 3.3 installed, running in vmware esxi added ulimit -n 3 dnsperf -q 4000 -l 120 -d 3million.dump Statistics: Parse input file: multiple times Run time limit: 120 s

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS + MySQL results not un-escaped?

2010-01-08 Thread Patrick Domack
this scenario? On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:27:31 -0500, Patrick Domack wrote: Most people have solved this issue awhile ago, but some people never upgrade or review documentation, so here is the things I would check. Sounds like this is php, so: Make sure magic_quotes_gpc is not on in php.ini, or b

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS + MySQL results not un-escaped?

2010-01-06 Thread Patrick Domack
Most people have solved this issue awhile ago, but some people never upgrade or review documentation, so here is the things I would check. Sounds like this is php, so: Make sure magic_quotes_gpc is not on in php.ini, or by other means Make sure the php program isn't using add_slashes If it is u

Re: [Pdns-users] RBL Anyone?

2009-10-15 Thread Patrick Domack
('zone_id','2.35.168.192.rbl.domain.com','A','127.0.0.2') I do this for emails, I run greylisting, and if I get >x attempts over 2 days and no emails have passed from that ip for 2weeks, they get put on the rbl. If the reverse dns for that ip changes, or a year passes, they are removed. It

Re: [Pdns-users] slave with ldap backend?

2008-01-02 Thread Patrick Domack
Personally I have mine set as ldap master, and use the bind backend to service a few slave domains on one of my servers. I dunno how well it would scale, but works good for the 5 slave accounts it handles. Quoting Bob Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I have a DNS server that is currently master

Re: [Pdns-users] pdns-recursor peering

2007-10-12 Thread Patrick Domack
I suppose if you didn't care about memory, you could push the incoming replies each server receives to the other servers. Then you wouldn't have to check each server or have a time issue. Quoting Jan Gyselinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:30:11PM +1000, Mick Pollard wrote

Re: [Pdns-users] Massive DNS DDOS attack

2007-10-10 Thread Patrick Domack
Looks like someone using the dns vpn to me. It could easily be a virus talking back for instructions though. Quoting Dan Nica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: since sunday night the DDOS stared, I think it is a new virus, but we didn't find anything about this virus ... we have limited the queries with a