Thanks, Arsen, for this information.
Are there any statistics on the number of mailservers/... requesting SPF
records instead of TXT records?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Arsen STASIC [mailto:arsen.sta...@univie.ac.at]
Verzonden: donderdag 6 september 2012 16:15
Aan: Marc van de Geijn
According to rfc's the dns server should publish both spf and txt. We now
create the spf, but not the txt version of the same spf.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Marc van de Geijn
bHosted.nl
Op 5 sep. 2012 om 15:27 heeft "Peter van Dijk"
het volgende geschreven:
> Hello Marc,
&
m/trac
Regards,
Ruben
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:36:16AM +0000, Marc van de Geijn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just googled for 30 minutes for information about SPF records. At this
> moment only SPF records are published, but we noticed that some mailservers
> still only check for TXT re
Hi,
I just googled for 30 minutes for information about SPF records. At this moment
only SPF records are published, but we noticed that some mailservers still only
check for TXT records. Is there some option in PowerDNS to automaticly publish
SPF records also as TXT records? Or do we have to do
s.com
Onderwerp: Re: [Pdns-users] RRSIG records not served by slave server
For me this doesn't work either. However, when I "dig A @ns2.<...>
+dnssec" I do see the RRSIG records. Is this also the case with you?
Regards,
Nicky
On 15 aug. 2012, at 11:27, Marc van de Geijn wrote:
Hi
Hi,
Our configuration is 2 powerdns servers, both running the latest stable 3.1
version. Master/slave sync using AXFR. The primary DNS server is responding to
'dig RRSIG @ns1.<...>' and returns the requested DNS records. But,
although showing the same updated SOA record, does not return the re
