[Pdns-users] ENUM order value question! ? :)

2015-12-21 Thread Jonathan Hunter
Hi Guys, I wondered if anyone had seen similar results to me or if I need to reconfigure anything. Essentially Im using Power dns dig command to the power dns ENUM server returns results in order value; 8.3.4.0.9.1.7.1.9.7.4.4.e164.sip 120 IN NAPTR 74 3 "U" "E2U+sip" "!^(.*)$!sip:*241*\\1@1.2.

[Pdns-users] Order Value Decimal Place /leading Zero behaviour

2015-03-05 Thread Jonathan Hunter
Hi Guys, I am testing the Order Value in the content of NAPTR records using powerdns and MySQL database. I am trying to see an order value of 0.000322 which is lowest cost entry for one target carrier, and 0.0049 for a slightly more expensive carrier. So content looks like this in the records ta

[Pdns-users] FW: Optimize Powerdns and Mysql for DB with 500K entries

2015-02-26 Thread Jonathan Hunter
Average non-late response time: 569.60 usec What kind of statistics are you seeing? Do you get large amounts of I/O wait on the server? Is your mysql innodb buffer pool size large enough to hold the entire table in RAM? Chris On 26/02/2015 2:40 AM, J

[Pdns-users] Optimize Powerdns and Mysql for DB with 500K entries

2015-02-25 Thread Jonathan Hunter
Hi Guys, I appreciate there are optimization tips on the website, however I wondered if there are any specific tips for optimization when dealing with a records table or associated view of 500K rows in a Mysql backend database on a Virtual Centos Machine with 2 x 3Ghz processors, 1GB RAM and 20G

[Pdns-users] longest-digit match in records name lookup NAPTR

2015-02-24 Thread Jonathan Hunter
Hi Guys, Sorry, last question for a while! Is it possible to disable longest-digit match in the name lookup? I only ask as running queries on the following entries (shown below from records table) using for example a dig to NAPTR 4.3.2.1.5.5.5.4.0.7.1.0.0.e164.sip.mn, the call is always routed to

[Pdns-users] Multiple Entries in the Content field of NAPTR records.

2015-02-20 Thread Jonathan Hunter
Hi All, Is it possible when implementing NAPTR records in the records table to add multiple entries within the content field of a record? Im just trying to reduce the number of entries in the database, so wondered if I could have more than one content entry, and if so how do you split them up? So

[Pdns-users] Modify Records Table-Time of Day records

2015-02-11 Thread Jonathan Hunter
Hi Guys, I have implemented an ENUM server using powerdns and its working well. I store data of course in the powerdns database, and in particular the records table. Is it possible to modify the structure of the records table, to add new fields? Also has anyone implemented Time of day routing with

Re: [Pdns-users] NAPTR wildcard records on PDNS version 3.3

2014-06-09 Thread Jonathan Hunter
n Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 06:50:07PM +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > I need to verify if this is a bug in 3.3 first (or someone else ofc). > > > > Aki > > > > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 03:15:16PM +, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > > > Hi Aki, > > > In fact o

Re: [Pdns-users] NAPTR wildcard records on PDNS version 3.3

2014-06-05 Thread Jonathan Hunter
DNS version 3.3 > > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:44:23AM +, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Sorry to trouble you all, just wondered if anyone can help. > > I am using Powerdns as an ENUM server, and for single records its working > > well, however for wildcar

Re: [Pdns-users] NAPTR wildcard records on PDNS version 3.3

2014-06-05 Thread Jonathan Hunter
DNS version 3.3 > > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:44:23AM +, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Sorry to trouble you all, just wondered if anyone can help. > > I am using Powerdns as an ENUM server, and for single records its working > > well, however for wildcar

[Pdns-users] NAPTR wildcard records on PDNS version 3.3

2014-06-05 Thread Jonathan Hunter
Hi Guys, Sorry to trouble you all, just wondered if anyone can help. I am using Powerdns as an ENUM server, and for single records its working well, however for wildcard entries I am having issues. Im sure its just syntax from my point of view, however looking at the associated RFCs and guides i