l do this, but not
> holding my breath for a solution (if any)
> 3) delay DNS replies a millisecond or so. Not ideal as this introduces delay.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Djerk Geurts
>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment w
On 2025/05/08 15:25, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
The logs (in your original post) are redacted. So we cannot correlate
the log lines with your config. If posting unredacted logs is not
possible we cannot help you here.
-Otto
Thanks Otto, I'll check internally if we can share otherwise, thanks
Question Djerk: why are you running your firewalls in active/active?
This is an unusual configuration that has many challenges, including the
one you've just mentioned.
Regards
Robby
On 2025/05/12 15:04, Djerk Geurts via Pdns-users wrote:
An odd statement possibly, but I’m looking for a way
An odd statement possibly, but I’m looking for a way to solve a problem (even
if it’s a temporary solution).
The DC firewalls have changed and the recursors are located in a DMZ behind two
HA firewalls in active/active mode. So far so good. The firewalls sync their
state tables, so asymmetric r
