On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:28 Tom Barrett via Pdns-users <
pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com> wrote:
> I would be interested in speaking with anyone who has experimented with
> customizing PowerDNS to support IPFS or the DNSLink TXT record type.
>
There’s not anything for PowerDNS to do here. They’
So my questions are : where does the key-id (returned in DNSKEY
records) comes from and how I can get it from DB ?
The key tag (or key ID) of a DNSKEY record is not stored in the database; it is
a value which is calculated from the binary key; see RFC 4034, appendix B.
Using pdnsutil show the D
I would be interested in speaking with anyone who has experimented with
customizing PowerDNS to support IPFS or the DNSLink TXT record type.
Thanks
Tom
--
Thomas Barrett
President
EnCirca, Inc
+1.781.942.9975 (office)
400 W. Cummings Park, Suite 1725
Woburn, MA 01801 USA
___
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 17:58, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Please show your full configuration, including versions etc. Also, it
is not clear which product you are using.
The recursor docs say:
"Note that once a Proxy Protocol header has been received, the source
address from the proxy
From: Erik Winkels via Pdns-users
To: Robby Pedrica via Pdns-users
Reply-To: Erik Winkels
Date: Fri, Jan 20 2023 16:49:06 GMT-02:00
Subject:[Pdns-users] Docker image upgrade version issue
Hi Robby,
Hi Robby,
> On 01/20/2023 3:55 PM CET Robby Pedrica via Pdns-users
> wrote:
>
> I've upgraded the pdns-recursor docker image today for the 4.8.0 vuln
> recently noted. My version from pdns-recursor is now listed as:
>
> Version: PowerDNS recursor 0.0.0.0.HEAD.gHEAD
>
> This is different f
Hi !
I'm looking for a way to get the key-id of a DNSKEY stored in mysql
backend. In "cryptokeys" table, I have all the details of the key,
except "key-id". I cannot find it anywhere else in my DB.
So my questions are : where does the key-id (returned in DNSKEY
records) comes from and how I can g
Please show your full configuration, including versions etc. Also, it
is not clear which product you are using.
The recursor docs say:
"Note that once a Proxy Protocol header has been received, the source
address from the proxy header instead of the address of the proxy will
be checked against th
Hi all,
I'm not sure if this is a change in behaviour or I simply haven't noticed
this before but after upgrading my docker image today, I've seen queries
being dropped due to the mapped address in my proxy mappings being used for
allow-from rather than the src/original address. I use a private-pu
I've upgraded the pdns-recursor docker image today for the 4.8.0 vuln
recently noted. My version from pdns-recursor is now listed as:
Version: PowerDNS recursor 0.0.0.0.HEAD.gHEAD
This is different from previous where it indicated the actual version, eg.
4.8.0. Is this expected or an issue?
--
Hello,
Today we have released PowerDNS Recursor 4.8.1 due to a high severity
issue found.
Please find the full text of the advisory below.
The [1]changelog is available.
The [2]tarball ([3]signature) is available from our download [4]server.
Patches are available at [5]patc
11 matches
Mail list logo