Re: [Pdns-users] problem with 4.1.0 recursion removed

2019-08-11 Thread Brian Candler
On 11/08/2019 18:12, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote: Hmm. Might it also work to do something really simple involving more than one recursor? If the primary recursor had something like this: forward-zones-recurse=e164.arpa=10.0.0.11;1.1.1.1 ...and the one at 10.0.0.11 then had: forward-zones=e164.a

Re: [Pdns-users] problem with 4.1.0 recursion removed

2019-08-11 Thread Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via Pdns-users
Juha Heinanen via Pdns-users writes: > Some of the e164.arpa domains used in my SIP Proxy environment are > private and thus (on purpose), are not registered under e164.arpa. Depending on what software you're using, it may be possible to work around this by using another DNS domain. With Asteri