Sorry. I meant the authoritative nameserver did respond with the correct
answer.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 11:21 PM, bert hubert wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:52:26AM +, Shawn Zhou wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am trying out pdns recursor 4.0.6 on Ubuntu Xenial and cache look
Hi Bert,
Thanks for your quick response. 4.1 didn't work and I already set
use-incoming-edns-subnet but I was getting timeouts. From what I could see from
my tcpdump, the authoritative server didn't return the correct answerÂ
root@DFW01-CPS01:~# service pdns-recursor restart
* Restarting PowerDN
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:52:26AM +, Shawn Zhou wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying out pdns recursor 4.0.6 on Ubuntu Xenial and cache lookup for
> same record with and without client subnet give me the same result which is
> not expected. I expect [3] to return a different value as the cache should
Hi,
I am trying out pdns recursor 4.0.6 on Ubuntu Xenial and cache lookup for same
record with and without client subnet give me the same result which is not
expected. I expect [3] to return a different value as the cache should have
different value based on client subnet. I wonder if that's bug
