Re: [Pdns-users] GeoIP Backend with replication to slave for redundancy

2017-02-20 Thread Aki Tuomi
On 21.02.2017 03:36, Phang WM wrote: > Hi, > Is it possible to configure the GeoIP Backend with replication to > slave (DNS Master-Slave) for redundancy? > > Thanks > > > ___ > Pdns-users mailing list > Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com > https://mailman

[Pdns-users] GeoIP Backend with replication to slave for redundancy

2017-02-20 Thread Phang WM
Hi, Is it possible to configure the GeoIP Backend with replication to slave (DNS Master-Slave) for redundancy? Thanks ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users

Re: [Pdns-users] pdns-recursor issue with resolving domains which placed on ns*.domaincontrol.com name servers

2017-02-20 Thread David
On 2017-02-20 2:00 PM, Максим Подлесный wrote: In the log we had only: Sending SERVFAIL to 127.0.0.1 during resolve of '9p.com .' because: Too much time waiting for 9p.com.|A, timeouts: 1, throttles: 0, queries: 4, 6497msec dig works fine but slow (about 5-6 sec for this domains)

[Pdns-users] pdns 'native replication'

2017-02-20 Thread stancs3
With ref to pdns documentation, 'native replication' is defined as replication that is taken care of by the backend sql db replication. One then refers to the pdns servers as primary/secondary and not master/slave. There no zone transfers etc. I have this set up and working via postgresql replicat

[Pdns-users] pdns-recursor issue with resolving domains which placed on ns*.domaincontrol.com name servers

2017-02-20 Thread Максим Подлесный
We have an issue with resolving domains of our customers via pdns-recursors (checked on versions 4.0.4 and 3.7.3). Those domains are controls by name servers ns47.domaincontrol.com and ns48.domaincontrol.com I can't tell here which domains we are resolving but I found one domain which are placed o

Re: [Pdns-users] [Fwd: Re: DiG: Hopefully Final Thoughts..]

2017-02-20 Thread Brian Candler
On 20/02/2017 00:38, stancs3 wrote: I have attached the remaining thing I cannot resolve (no pun). 1. The test above the = line is: Recursor listening on port 53, forwarding to auth server listening on port 5300. Dig of NS replies with no Additional section. Dig of ns1 replies with the A r