Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-09 Thread Nick Williams
> On Jan 9, 2016, at 3:28 PM, Pieter Lexis wrote: > > Hi Nick, > > On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:48:12 -0600 > Nicholas Williams wrote: > >> But the documentation says the opposite. It says NOT to create >> NSEC(3) records (in fact, zone2sql intentionally ignores them, even >> for presigned zones), b

Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-09 Thread Pieter Lexis
Hi Nick, On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:48:12 -0600 Nicholas Williams wrote: > But the documentation says the opposite. It says NOT to create > NSEC(3) records (in fact, zone2sql intentionally ignores them, even > for presigned zones), because (again, it says) PowerDNS generates > then automatically, eve

Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-09 Thread Nicholas Williams
Sent from my iPhone, so please forgive brief replies and frequent typos > On Jan 9, 2016, at 14:22, Pieter Lexis wrote: > > Hi William, > > On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 13:41:51 -0600 > Nick Williams wrote: > >> I can’t think of anything I missed. And, clearly, PowerDNS is >> correctly generating NSE

Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-09 Thread Pieter Lexis
Hi William, On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 13:41:51 -0600 Nick Williams wrote: > I can’t think of anything I missed. And, clearly, PowerDNS is > correctly generating NSEC3 records. But it’s not signing those > records. This is because the zone is presigned, PowerDNS cannot generate the signatures on the NS

Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-09 Thread Nick Williams
So, I think I’ve almost got this, but I’m having a problem with the pre-signed zone’s NSEC3 RRSIGs. Here’s what I did: I already have a live-signed zone (my-zone.com) that works perfectly. A-records come with automatic RRSIGs, SOA record comes with an RRSIG, NS records come with an RRSIG, etc.

Re: [Pdns-users] Need help with PowerDNS Remote HTTP Backend

2016-01-09 Thread Aki Tuomi
It works if you use HTTP/1.1 compatible responses. RFC says that you either need to send your response chunked or set content-length. YaHTTP will check and enforce this. Aki On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 11:10:19AM +0200, Aleksey Chudov wrote: > Finally I found the cause of the problem. PowerDNS Remote

Re: [Pdns-users] Virtual servers in pdns-recursor

2016-01-09 Thread sthaug
> 10 instances ?? > Im experimenting with 4 recursor instances because I have plenty of cpu and > ram: > > top - 16:20:08 up 8 days, 7:36, 3 users, load average: 0.06, 0.05, 0.05 > Tasks: 383 total, 1 running, 382 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 5.5%us, 2.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 91.4%id,

Re: [Pdns-users] Virtual servers in pdns-recursor

2016-01-09 Thread Miguel Miranda
Well, after several hours of sending dnsdist stats i see embarrassing numbers, considering the load and memory usage and still i got a lot 200 ms response time (dnsdist.dns1j4s0n.main), what could be the cause of this, network latency or am i totally messed up the recursor config? Each instance has

Re: [Pdns-users] Need help with PowerDNS Remote HTTP Backend

2016-01-09 Thread Aleksey Chudov
Finally I found the cause of the problem. PowerDNS Remote HTTP Backend works only with 'Content-Length' header. So, the following code works until 'Content-Length' header exists. import BaseHTTPServer class HTTPRequestHandler(BaseHTTPServer.BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def do_GET(self):