Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-06 Thread leen
On 2016-01-06 20:42, Nicholas Williams wrote: I'll look into that other script. Thanks, Bert.  How about a creating a separate sub-zone with a broken presigned DNSSEC  You can set presigned for just that single zone using the PRESIGNED domain metadata[1] int your database. I really like th

Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-06 Thread Michael Loftis
(inline) On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Nicholas Williams wrote: > I'll look into that other script. Thanks, Bert. > >> How about a creating a separate sub-zone with a broken presigned DNSSEC > >> You can set presigned for just that single zone using the PRESIGNED domain >> metadata[1] int your

Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-06 Thread Nicholas Williams
I'll look into that other script. Thanks, Bert. > How about a creating a separate sub-zone with a broken presigned DNSSEC > You can set presigned for just that single zone using the PRESIGNED domain metadata[1] int your database. I really like this idea in combination. That documentation that Pi

Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-06 Thread Pieter Lexis
Hi Nick, On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:26:59 -0600 Nicholas Williams wrote: > Yea, but that's the rub. I want to do this WITHOUT 'presigned zones.' > I want everything else to be live-signed (because it's SO much easier > than presigning), and only munge this one subdomain's RRSIGs. You can set presign

Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-06 Thread bert hubert
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 01:26:59PM -0600, Nicholas Williams wrote: > I'm looking into using a postresolve Lua script for this, as Aki suggested, > because it sounds like that's likely the only way to do what I want. I > found this sample, which is pretty helpful: Well - the reason you can't find t

Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-06 Thread leen
On 2016-01-06 20:26, Nicholas Williams wrote: Yea, but that's the rub. I want to do this WITHOUT 'presigned zones.' I want everything else to be live-signed (because it's SO much easier than presigning), and only munge this one subdomain's RRSIGs. How about a creating a separate sub-zone with

Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-06 Thread Nicholas Williams
Yea, but that's the rub. I want to do this WITHOUT 'presigned zones.' I want everything else to be live-signed (because it's SO much easier than presigning), and only munge this one subdomain's RRSIGs. I'm looking into using a postresolve Lua script for this, as Aki suggested, because it sounds li

Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-06 Thread bert hubert
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:46:38PM -0600, Nicholas Williams wrote: > Out of curiosity, what DOES PowerDNS do if it finds an both an A and an > RRSIG record for a.b.c.com in the database? Hi Nicholas, To answer both your messages in one go, if you run with 'presigned zones', PowerDNS will use the

Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-06 Thread Nicholas Williams
Out of curiosity, what DOES PowerDNS do if it finds an both an A and an RRSIG record for a.b.c.com in the database? Nick On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > The code does not support this but you might be able to use postresolve > Lua hook to break the reply signature. > > --- >

[Pdns-users] Setting up intentionally invalid DNSSEC record in auto-secure environment

2016-01-06 Thread Nick Williams
Hi all, We're running a PowerDNS 3.4.6 installation with the MySQL backend, and we’re using pdnsutil secure-zone/set-nsec3/rectify-zone to automatically secure all of our domains (the least-effort method, instead of manually signing everything). It works great. Thanks for the excellent software