On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 02:39:49PM +0100, Morten Stevens wrote:
> Here is my result compared with bind and unbound:
> 1) pdns-recursor 3.6.2: 169k QPS
> 2) unbound 1.5.1: 327k QPS
> 3) bind 9.9.4-P2: 251k QPS
Well - let me describe how we like to do our benchmarking.
1) Use tcpdump to record actu
Am 22.12.2014 um 17:36 schrieb Ciro Iriarte:
Hi Winfried, the machine has 1 Opteron 6386 SE processor, with 16
cores + 16GB of memory. AMD doesn't sport HT.
Ah, I see. But I have no explanation. I have tested with a Intel Xeon
CPU with 8 cores.
___
Morten Stevens wrote:
> 2014-12-18 0:23 GMT+01:00 Ciro Iriarte :
> > Hi!, could anybody achieve more than 100k QPS on a recursor while hitting
> > cache?.
> >
> > I only run two tests so far and in both cases the ceiling was around 100k
> > QPS. The machine seems to be able to take more beating, m
2014-12-22 12:12 GMT-03:00 abang :
> Hello Ciro,
>
> Your server has 8 cores. I don't know if the Recursor benefits from
> hyperthreading (would be good to know). If you run the Recursor with
> threads=4 you have only 4 cores left for the clients. I got the best result
> with 4 Recursor threads an
Hello Ciro,
Your server has 8 cores. I don't know if the Recursor benefits from
hyperthreading (would be good to know). If you run the Recursor with
threads=4 you have only 4 cores left for the clients. I got the best
result with 4 Recursor threads and two clients. But I think you can
improv
2014-12-18 0:23 GMT+01:00 Ciro Iriarte :
> Hi!, could anybody achieve more than 100k QPS on a recursor while hitting
> cache?.
>
> I only run two tests so far and in both cases the ceiling was around 100k
> QPS. The machine seems to be able to take more beating, maybe I just need
> more clients or
Hello Chuyen,
On 17 Dec 2014, at 5:30 , Chuyen Vo wrote:
> As we have some name-servers running 3.3 and we are rolling out testing
> upgrade to 3.4. I followed the instruction DB schema here:
> http://doc.powerdns.com/md/authoritative/upgrading/
>
> When we add more fields such as ordername w
