On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:58:43PM -0500, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:56:17PM -0300, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
> > > 2014-10-27 3:46 GMT-03:00 Aki Tuomi :
> > > >
> > > > In a way i'd chosen sqlite3 instead as it is pret
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:56:17PM -0300, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
> > 2014-10-27 3:46 GMT-03:00 Aki Tuomi :
> > >
> > > In a way i'd chosen sqlite3 instead as it is pretty much on par with cdb.
> > > But, to make it work properly, i'd just ad
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:56:17PM -0300, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
> 2014-10-27 3:46 GMT-03:00 Aki Tuomi :
> >
> > In a way i'd chosen sqlite3 instead as it is pretty much on par with cdb.
> > But, to make it work properly, i'd just add "*.domain.com", and when you
> > lookup,
> > you could reduce it l
2014-10-27 3:46 GMT-03:00 Aki Tuomi :
>
> In a way i'd chosen sqlite3 instead as it is pretty much on par with cdb.
> But, to make it work properly, i'd just add "*.domain.com", and when you
> lookup,
> you could reduce it like this with get()
>
> www.my.long.name.com => NOT FOUND
> *.my.long.name
