Re: [Pdns-users] New recursor install, 50% timeout on first run

2014-10-13 Thread Ciro Iriarte
2014-10-13 10:37 GMT-03:00 bert hubert : > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:10:43AM -0300, Ciro Iriarte wrote: >> Hi!, I'm running some quick tests on a new Recursor (3.6.1) and I see >> ~ 50% query timeouts. It has a good Internet connection but no clients >> yet, can this be caused by empty cache?. > >

Re: [Pdns-users] New recursor install, 50% timeout on first run

2014-10-13 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:10:43AM -0300, Ciro Iriarte wrote: > Hi!, I'm running some quick tests on a new Recursor (3.6.1) and I see > ~ 50% query timeouts. It has a good Internet connection but no clients > yet, can this be caused by empty cache?. Yes, on a cold cache, nameservers are a lot slow

[Pdns-users] New recursor install, 50% timeout on first run

2014-10-13 Thread Ciro Iriarte
Hi!, I'm running some quick tests on a new Recursor (3.6.1) and I see ~ 50% query timeouts. It has a good Internet connection but no clients yet, can this be caused by empty cache?. It's pretty much default configuration, tried to push threads from 2 to 10, but it still gives me a lot of queries u

Re: [Pdns-users] Oracle/goracle - bug or my lack of knowledge?

2014-10-13 Thread Leo Vandewoestijne
Hi all, a b wrote: > You appear to have libraries and includes from both Oracle database and > Oracle instant client on your machine. > I know from experience that linking with database client libraries does not > work any more > That may be true, but only for the RHEL case. The two others did

Re: [Pdns-users] Duplicate RRs in records table

2014-10-13 Thread Peter van Dijk
Hello Stephen, On 11 Oct 2014, at 21:37 , Stephen Frost wrote: > This doesn't appear to have been addressed in 3.4.0- was the bug ever > submitted and is there a plan to fix it..? We are tracking it as https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/1502. There is no fix yet. Kind regards, -- Peter

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS for a TLD...

2014-10-13 Thread Peter van Dijk
Hello, On 13 Oct 2014, at 7:51 , Rob wrote: > > So in "untechnical","policywise" language: > > do you need to delegate authority ...? > > If not, then maybe keep it simple (whichever method that is). > > In some cases, we’ll be delegating authority, so we'll simply have the domain > NS reco