On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:46:43AM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> Hello Ken,
>
> >> Okay, using the assumption that the code has a bug, here is the PostgreSQL
> >> version:
>
> As a followup: Kees Monshouwer has set up a Jenkins job for Oracle testing
> recently. All tests pass, suggesting the O
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:42:18AM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> Hello Ken,
>
> replying to both messages in-line.
>
> On 09 Jan 2014, at 23:47 , k...@rice.edu wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:26:07AM -0600, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> >> WHILE lpos <= LENGTH(dnsname) LOOP
> >>rpos := IN
Hello Ken,
>> Okay, using the assumption that the code has a bug, here is the PostgreSQL
>> version:
As a followup: Kees Monshouwer has set up a Jenkins job for Oracle testing
recently. All tests pass, suggesting the Oracle code is fine.
Kind regards,
--
Peter van Dijk
Netherlabs Computer Cons
Hello Ken,
replying to both messages in-line.
On 09 Jan 2014, at 23:47 , k...@rice.edu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:26:07AM -0600, k...@rice.edu wrote:
>> WHILE lpos <= LENGTH(dnsname) LOOP
>>rpos := INSTR(dnsname, '.', lpos);
rpos is set here, did you miss that?
> Okay, using the
