Hello Alex,
On Jul 9, 2013, at 1:00 , Alex Flex wrote:
> dig epochdns.com ns +trace
>
> That yields that the domains nameservers as pointed in the registry is
> ns1./ns2/ns3/ns4.dns-dns-dns.tk but the actual nameservers in the zone file
> differs.
>
> The domain resolves perfectly well.. my
Hello Aki,
On Jul 8, 2013, at 21:38 , Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Can you please elaborate who should do this and when? Recursor operators? Auth
> operators?
There is no action required from recursor operators. Auth operators that use
edns-client-subnet in a backend need to take action on the to-be-de
Sorry but is your problem related to PowerDNS ?
--Chuyen
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Alex Flex wrote:
> Hello PowerDNS
>
> dig epochdns.com ns +trace
>
> That yields that the domains nameservers as pointed in the registry is
> ns1./ns2/ns3/ns4.dns-dns-dns.tk but the actual nameservers in t
Hello PowerDNS
dig epochdns.com ns +trace
That yields that the domains nameservers as pointed in the registry is
ns1./ns2/ns3/ns4.dns-dns-dns.tk but the actual nameservers in the zone
file differs.
The domain resolves perfectly well.. my question is what real life
issues can that generate
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 08:15:57PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please read
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/afasterinternet/HJD2WphubOg/Lt7GB2Y9deAJ
> , then read the rest of this email.
>
> PowerDNS does not currently support using two option numbers in parallel -
> patches welc
Hello,
Please read
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/afasterinternet/HJD2WphubOg/Lt7GB2Y9deAJ
, then read the rest of this email.
PowerDNS does not currently support using two option numbers in parallel -
patches welcome.
As Wlimer's email promises a change-over date, our current advice is to
s
