Hi,
I have reading up and made a little lab with three servers.
Master 192.168.1.5, superslaves .6 and .7.
Everything with auto provisioning works as planned, but I get some
weird info in my logs.
Received unsuccessful notification report for 'example.com' from
192.168.1.5:53, rcode: 4
I've done
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:38:22PM +0530, Manish Rane wrote:
> Absolutely wondering if check scripts from nagios can be utilized for the
> same and of course with lower TTL values to have the changes propagated
> rapidly.
"Rapidly" being in the order of about a minute in the best case
without caus
That is how GLSB works or GTMs. This is very known technology.
On 17 Dec 2012 18:16, "kalpesh thaker" wrote:
>
> On 17/12/2012 14:08, Manish Rane wrote:
>
>>
>> Absolutely wondering if check scripts from nagios can be utilized for the
>> same and of course with lower TTL values to have the change
On 17/12/2012 14:08, Manish Rane wrote:
Absolutely wondering if check scripts from nagios can be utilized for
the same and of course with lower TTL values to have the changes
propagated rapidly.
I personally have just started using power dns hence not sure about
changing zones from sql bac
It seems to be modern, to try to solve all problems with DNS. But DNS is
neither a router nor a load balancer and certainly not a HA cluster.
"Always use the proper tool. If the proper tool isn't available, use a
hammer." (Lt. Commander Montgomery „Scotty“ Scott)
Am 17.12.2012 12:59, schrieb
Absolutely wondering if check scripts from nagios can be utilized for the
same and of course with lower TTL values to have the changes propagated
rapidly.
I personally have just started using power dns hence not sure about
changing zones from sql backend but I believe this could be possible.
I si
Hello,
On Dec 17, 2012, at 12:39 , Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:17:59AM +0530, Manish Rane wrote:
>> By the way PDNS Development Team can think of such feature and probably
>> include in upcoming release? That would make the product more versatile and
>> complete.
>
> In my opi
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:17:59AM +0530, Manish Rane wrote:
> By the way PDNS Development Team can think of such feature and probably
> include in upcoming release? That would make the product more versatile and
> complete.
In my opinion, this does not belong into a DNS server. PowerDNS has
versa