Hello,
On Oct 31, 2012, at 21:36 , a b wrote:
> > The VM box we use for development cannot host Solaris. Ignoring that, my
> > lack of experience with Solaris -and- Oracle would make this a
> > time-consuming project which means other projects with more immediate
> > benefits get preference.
>
Hello John,
On Nov 1, 2012, at 0:35 , John Miller wrote:
> Is there currently a way to change the response code for chaos-class queries?
> It's not terribly important, but I noticed that ns*.google.com are now
> returning 4-NOTIMP for their status. I'd like to either set that or just
> refus
Il 31/10/2012 21:17, Peter van Dijk ha scritto:
This idea pushes all my buttons with regards to having PowerDNS
provide the right infrastructure and leaving the glue to the user.
Would you write a ticket at wiki.powerdns.com about it so we can have
a more targeted discussion there? Tickets tend
Hello everyone,
Is there currently a way to change the response code for chaos-class
queries? It's not terribly important, but I noticed that ns*.google.com
are now returning 4-NOTIMP for their status. I'd like to either set
that or just refuse the queries outright.
I'm trying to get my re
> The VM box we use for development cannot host Solaris. Ignoring that, my lack
> of experience with Solaris -and- Oracle would make this a time-consuming
> project which means other projects with more immediate benefits get
> preference.
If we were to provide you with as many Solaris and Oracl
> instead of adding the requested feature to PowerDNS, is possible to add
> 2 feautures to pdns_control:
>
> 1) pdns_control list_domains, which will return all domains managed by
> PowerDNS
>
> 2) pdns_control delete $domain, which will perform the zone deletion
>
> These two function will he
Hello Andrea,
On Oct 31, 2012, at 20:23 , Andrea Cappelli wrote:
> Il 31/10/2012 10:00, Peter van Dijk ha scritto:
>> I responded to that about 10 hours after you first asked it. Was anything in
>> my response unclear? Kind regards,
>
> Hello Peter,
> instead of adding the requested feature to
Il 31/10/2012 10:00, Peter van Dijk ha scritto:
I responded to that about 10 hours after you first asked it. Was
anything in my response unclear? Kind regards,
Hello Peter,
instead of adding the requested feature to PowerDNS, is possible to add
2 feautures to pdns_control:
1) pdns_control l
Thanks guys
It is working now.
Van: Stefan Schmidt [mailto:zaph...@zaphods.net]
Verzonden: woensdag 31 oktober 2012 11:36
Aan: Steffan Noord
CC: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Onderwerp: Re: [Pdns-users] office365 and powerdns
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Steffan Noord wrote:
H
On 31/10/2012 12:26, Steffan Noord wrote:
Oke thanxs
But how is that explained ?
Name: _sip._tcp.example.com.
Type: SRV
Content: 100 5 5060 sipdir.online.lync.com."
TTL:3600
Prio: 100
??
based on your original email, i think your record w
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Steffan Noord wrote:
> Hello list,
>
Hello Steffan,
A client ask me to update his dns for office 365
> No problem but he also want to add a srv record
> How do i need to set this up ?
>
> Type: SRV
> Service: _sip
> Portocol: _tls
> Port: 443
> Weight: 1
> Prior
Oke thanxs
But how is that explained ?
Name: _sip._tcp.example.com.
Type:SRV
Content: 100 5 5060 sipdir.online.lync.com."
TTL:3600
Prio: 100
??
Van: pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com
[mailto:pdn
On 31/10/2012 12:14, Steffan Noord wrote:
Hello list,
A client ask me to update his dns for office 365
No problem but he also want to add a srv record
How do i need to set this up ?
Type: SRV
Service: _sip
Portocol: _tls
Port: 443
Weight: 1
Priority: 100
TTL 1 Hour
Domainnaam: example.com
Targe
Hello list,
A client ask me to update his dns for office 365
No problem but he also want to add a srv record
How do i need to set this up ?
Type: SRV
Service: _sip
Portocol: _tls
Port: 443
Weight: 1
Priority: 100
TTL 1 Hour
Domainnaam: example.com
Target:sipdir.online.lync.com
Hope someone can h
Hello,
On Oct 30, 2012, at 19:18 , k...@rice.edu wrote:
> It would be hideously ugly, but you could leverage a special content DNS
> record to allow the super master to tell the slave that the domain is or
> will be deleted. It would require a little bit of smarts/timing and
> cooperation
> but
Hello,
On Oct 30, 2012, at 14:50 , a b wrote:
> My main question still remains unanswered though: one of the main reasons we
> ditched BIND was the supermaster / superslave functionality.
>
> If I open a request for enhancement, how much impetus inside of PowerDNS is
> there to implement this
Hello,
On Oct 29, 2012, at 19:39 , a b wrote:
> As far as I know, Oracle corporation does not support Debian - the only two
> Linux operating systems it does support are Oracle enterprise Linux and
> redhat enterprise Linux, and that with Oracle enterprise Linux essentially
> being a redhat de
17 matches
Mail list logo
