Hello!
Thank you for your reply.
Yes, it's works.
AXFR ACLs i need to do it myself in backend?
If I enable "master=yes" in pdns.conf, will PowerDNS send notifications to NS
servers?
In PowerDNS documentation
(http://doc.powerdns.com/backends-detail.html#pipebackend):
Master No
Slave No
12
Hi Jörg!
On 13.09.2012 14:17, joerg jungermann wrote:
Hi Klaus!
Are there any plans to implement DNS RRL
(http://www.redbarn.org/dns/ratelimits) or similar for PowerDNS? These
DNS amplification attacks are really annoying.
Yes, this might be a nice feature.
As DNS traffic regularily constist
On 13.09.2012 14:01, Mark Scholten wrote:
I am confused about the results in
>http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-dev/2012-June/001179.html It
>seems that powerdns is slower without the LUA rate limiting script. What
do I
>miss here?
>
>Not sure - perhaps Mark can clarify.
If the LU
On 13.09.2012 12:11, Peter van Dijk wrote:
Hello Klaus,
On Sep 13, 2012, at 12:09 , Klaus Darilion wrote:
Interesting.
Is the hook executed before or after the caches?
The hook is executed after the caches, currently. I do not feel the
current hook implementation is suitable for RRL produ
Hi,
I don't really like the idea to add more complexity to powerdns when I
can have a solution right now with using firewall rules in the kernel.
I'm sure it has a considerable performance impact if powerdns needs a
counter with last updated timestamp for each and every source ip. These
list
Hi Klaus!
> Are there any plans to implement DNS RRL
> (http://www.redbarn.org/dns/ratelimits) or similar for PowerDNS? These
> DNS amplification attacks are really annoying.
Yes, this might be a nice feature.
As DNS traffic regularily constists of a lot of small UDP packets, that
have to be tran
Hello Peter and Klaus,
Sent: 13 September, 2012 12:11 by Peter van Dijk:
>
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 12:09 , Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
> > Interesting.
> >
> > Is the hook executed before or after the caches?
>
> The hook is executed after the caches, currently. I do not feel the
current
> hook imple
Hi!
We use pdns 3.1 (2607) as slave and we see several errors like:
pdns[777]: Exception building answer packet (Unable to parse DNS TXT
'"v=spf1 a include:spf.emailfiltering.com –all"') sending out servfail
The TXT record looks good:
regdns=# select content from records where type = 'TXT' A
Hello Klaus,
On Sep 13, 2012, at 12:09 , Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Interesting.
>
> Is the hook executed before or after the caches?
The hook is executed after the caches, currently. I do not feel the current
hook implementation is suitable for RRL production; I do think it's a great
playground
Interesting.
Is the hook executed before or after the caches?
I am confused about the results in
http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-dev/2012-June/001179.html It
seems that powerdns is slower without the LUA rate limiting script. What
do I miss here?
Is there also a reliable filterin
10 matches
Mail list logo