Re: [Pdns-users] Upgrading from 2.9.22 to 3.x

2011-10-17 Thread Peter van Dijk
Hello James, On Oct 18, 2011, at 1:58 , James Knowles wrote: > People have pointed out in e-mails that one should upgrade now. > > What is entailed with upgrading, besides slapping in a new RPM? (My servers > are running CentOS 5.) > > Specifically, are there steps to make any database changes

[Pdns-users] Upgrading from 2.9.22 to 3.x

2011-10-17 Thread James Knowles
People have pointed out in e-mails that one should upgrade now. What is entailed with upgrading, besides slapping in a new RPM? (My servers are running CentOS 5.) Specifically, are there steps to make any database changes, or is it just plug-n-play, so to speak? Thanks! ___

Re: [Pdns-users] Constantly increasing memory usage

2011-10-17 Thread Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
Stefan Schmidt wrote: >> We are using power dns 2.9.21 (We had that installed for us, so I am not >> 100% sure if this is really the exact version, is there a way to check?). > > rpm -qa pdns-server should tell if i remember correctly. The package we have installed from the EPEL repository is ju

[Pdns-users] Problem compiling PDNS 3.0 on RHEL 6.1

2011-10-17 Thread k...@rice.edu
Hi PDNS user community. I am having a problem compiling PDNS 3.0 on RHEL 6. It cannot locate some system libraries and I was wondering about the best way to correct the problem. It looks like libssl.so.1.0.0 is located in /usr/lib64: $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libssl.* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jun

Re: [Pdns-users] Issue with recursive lookups in pdns 3

2011-10-17 Thread Grant Keller
On 10/09/2011 09:25 AM, Christian Affolter wrote: Hi The problem, and I realise that I did not mention this before, is that these servers are mixed auth and recursive. What I am seeing with these queries is that pdns 3.0 is only returning the authoritative answer, while pdns 2.9 returns the rec

Re: [Pdns-users] 8% cache hits

2011-10-17 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi, On 16.10.2011 06:02, BH wrote: You could try extending the cache size and TTL, but I am not sure how effective that will be in this situation. First thing is as its an RBL, do you really want to cache entries for a long time? After an entry has been removed from a blacklist (eg. in the ca

Re: [Pdns-users] Constantly increasing memory usage

2011-10-17 Thread Stefan Schmidt
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:40 PM, ad...@cu.cc wrote: > Hello, Hey there, > I am not sure is this is the right email to contact, but here is my issue: As PowerDNS is OSS this is the right place to such questions. > We are using power dns 2.9.21 (We had that installed for us, so I am not > 100%

Re: [Pdns-users] Constantly increasing memory usage

2011-10-17 Thread BH
Hi Preslav, I run over 120,000 domains from a mySQL database and my memory usage averages about 200mb. Are you able to paste your config (redact the sensitive parts such as database details)? It would help to see the exact config thats running. Have you had a look at the syslogs to see if any err

[Pdns-users] Constantly increasing memory usage

2011-10-17 Thread ad...@cu.cc
Hello, I am not sure is this is the right email to contact, but here is my issue: We are using power dns 2.9.21 (We had that installed for us, so I am not 100% sure if this is really the exact version, is there a way to check?). The installation is myslq backended running on centos-5-x86_64 VP

Re: [Pdns-users] nsec3 and empty non-terminals

2011-10-17 Thread Peter van Dijk
Hello Florian, Just a note to say your email has not gone by without notice. I am working on expanding the PowerDNS tests, specifically in the DNSSEC area. I will make sure to cover the situation you are describing too. Thank you for your report :) Kind regards, Peter van Dijk On Oct 3, 2011,

Re: [Pdns-users] logging specific domain

2011-10-17 Thread bert hubert
For now, I would suggest tcpdump, or any of the other passive solutions. 'dnscap' also comes to mind. Bert On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:45:55AM +0200, Angel Bosch Mora wrote: > hi, > > i want to analize queries from one specific domain. > > i've activated webserver but i can only see top