Re: [Pdns-users] Not Authoritative for AAAA when label does not exist in zone?

2011-07-25 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 02:00:02PM -0700, Zane Thomas wrote: > Sorry about that, will be sure to note use of my own backend in the future. I suggest we move this discussion to pdns-dev. > This following code is setting weHaveUnauth to true because sd.qname != > rr.qname > > // the line bel

Re: [Pdns-users] Not Authoritative for AAAA when label does not exist in zone?

2011-07-25 Thread Zane Thomas
Sorry about that, will be sure to note use of my own backend in the future. As to the current issue I think this line of debug output is significant: Jul 25 12:31:51 returning ns1.bar.com ns1.bar.com. NS auth=1 This following code is setting weHaveUnauth to true because sd.qname != rr.qna

Re: [Pdns-users] Not Authoritative for AAAA when label does not exist in zone?

2011-07-25 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:39:37PM -0700, Zane Thomas wrote: > The backend is mine, in getSOA I always set auth=true for bar.com. The > backend is not DNSSEC enabled. Could you pretty please with sugar on top mention with any bug report that you are running based on a backend you wrote yourself? I

Re: [Pdns-users] Not Authoritative for AAAA when label does not exist in zone?

2011-07-25 Thread Zane Thomas
The backend is mine, in getSOA I always set auth=true for bar.com. The backend is not DNSSEC enabled. Here's some trace info, the lines beginning with getSOA, lookup, and returning are mine ... the rest I'm sure you will recognize. Jul 25 12:31:51 getSOA qname='ns1.bar.com' original='ns1.bar.com

Re: [Pdns-users] Not Authoritative for AAAA when label does not exist in zone?

2011-07-25 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:59:33AM -0700, Zane Thomas wrote: > zane@zane:~$ dig @10.11.247.52 +norecurse -t ns1.bar.com > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 38113 > ;; flags: qr; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;ns1.bar.com. IN

Re: [Pdns-users] Not Authoritative for AAAA when label does not exist in zone?

2011-07-25 Thread Zane Thomas
> Could you add the output of 'dig +norecurs -t bar.com' and 'dig > +norecurs -t foo.bar.com' and 'dig +norecurs -t any bar.com'. zane@zane:~$ dig @10.11.247.52 +norecurse -t bar.com ; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P1 <<>> @10.11.247.52 +norecurse -t bar.com ; (1 server found) ;; global opti

Re: [Pdns-users] Not Authoritative for AAAA when label does not exist in zone?

2011-07-25 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:23:52AM -0700, Zane Thomas wrote: > I have a zone bar.com for which pdns (3.0) is authoritative, there are no > records in the zone. Could you add the output of 'dig +norecurs -t bar.com' and 'dig +norecurs -t foo.bar.com' and 'dig +norecurs -t any bar.com

[Pdns-users] Not Authoritative for AAAA when label does not exist in zone?

2011-07-25 Thread Zane Thomas
I have a zone bar.com for which pdns (3.0) is authoritative, there are no records in the zone. If I query bar.com for the AA flag is set in the reply. There are no records for foo in bar.com; when I query for of foo.bar.com the AA flag is not set in the reply as I expect. Is this

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS recursor Dual Stack

2011-07-25 Thread Brielle Bruns
On 7/25/11 10:47 AM, Patrick Domack wrote: Why should I? it's working perfectly, and that sysctl is already set to 0 I must have misread what you were asking for then. Sorry! -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org/ http://www.ahbl.org ___

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS recursor Dual Stack

2011-07-25 Thread Patrick Domack
Why should I? it's working perfectly, and that sysctl is already set to 0 Quoting Brielle : sysctl -a | grep v6only If the resulting sysctl is set to 1, then change to 0. -- Brielle (sent from my iPhone) On Jul 25, 2011, at 7:48 AM, Patrick Domack wrote: My powerdns recursor v3.3 on ipv4

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS recursor Dual Stack

2011-07-25 Thread Brielle
sysctl -a | grep v6only If the resulting sysctl is set to 1, then change to 0. -- Brielle (sent from my iPhone) On Jul 25, 2011, at 7:48 AM, Patrick Domack wrote: > My powerdns recursor v3.3 on ipv4 and ipv6 works fine on linux. > > Binding to local-address to only ::1 and it doesn't respond

Re: [Pdns-users] 4th level names and SOA records

2011-07-25 Thread bert hubert
Grant, If at all possible, could you check what 3.0 does for your setup? This would help us narrow down the problem. Bert On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 02:13:13PM -0700, Grant Keller wrote: > On 07/20/2011 02:04 PM, Grant Keller wrote: > > On 07/14/2011 12:06 PM, bert hubert wrote: > >> On Th

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNS 3.0-rc3 rpm packages

2011-07-25 Thread bert hubert
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:28:35PM +0200, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote: > At first glance, everything seems to be working. Nevertheless, I > would like to know if this is suitable for continuous use. (with > respect to the final PowerDNS 3.0 rpms) Hi Morten, The best place for RHEL/CentOS is: http:/

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS recursor Dual Stack

2011-07-25 Thread Patrick Domack
My powerdns recursor v3.3 on ipv4 and ipv6 works fine on linux. Binding to local-address to only ::1 and it doesn't respond to 127.0.0.1 though. Quoting bert hubert : On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:34:29PM -0700, Chris Hesselrode wrote: I've disabled iptables and ip6tables, and get the same r

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS recursor Dual Stack

2011-07-25 Thread bert hubert
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:34:29PM -0700, Chris Hesselrode wrote: > I've disabled iptables and ip6tables, and get the same result. If you bind only to ::1, does the system answer on 127.0.0.1? It should, on Linux. Bert -- PowerDNS Website: http://www.powerdns.com/ PowerDNS Community Webs