On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:54:05AM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> Our EDNS-in-AXFR has been brought in line with RFC 5936 now. I hope this
> solves your problem!
I have essentially patched my pdns yesterday which fixed the problem.
> See http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/1994 - new packages ar
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:24:53PM +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
> Ok, think I have found it - Microsoft DNS doesn't seem to like the
> EDNS options in the AXFR packets. Guess that's why it says "WRONG" in
> tcpreceiver.cc, line 410...
Our EDNS-in-AXFR has been brought in line with RFC 5936 now.
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:52:37AM +, Maroon Ibrahim wrote:
>
> WOW! Thanks for the info Bert :)
>
> The Debian server that hosts PDNS Cursor doesn't apply any iptable rule...
> but this server is behind a firewall (MikorTik Router) and this firewall
> has tracking feature turned on...maybe
Please check the stats of my server in production use always cache HITS 11%
Feb 8 09:42:30 LebolDns pdns_recursor[1970]: Timeout from remote TCP client
109.75.64.121
Feb 8 09:42:31 LebolDns pdns_recursor[1970]: Timeout from remote TCP client
109.75.64.121
Feb 8 09:42:44 LebolDns pdns_re
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:40:56PM +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:17:52 +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 02:39:56PM +0100, bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl wrote:
> >> Thanks for reporting, we are on the case! The issue has been confirmed.
> > This has been fi
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:17:52 +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 02:39:56PM +0100, bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl wrote:
>> Thanks for reporting, we are on the case! The issue has been confirmed.
> This has been fixed in revision 1992. Can you confirm?
Doesn't seem to fix it for me (Micr
> This has been fixed in revision 1992. Can you confirm?
It is working again. Thanks for the quick fix!
-JP
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 02:39:56PM +0100, bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl wrote:
> Thanks for reporting, we are on the case! The issue has been confirmed.
This has been fixed in revision 1992. Can you confirm?
Bert
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-u
Thanks for reporting, we are on the case! The issue has been confirmed.
Sent from my phone.
- Reply message -
From: "Christof Meerwald"
Date: Mon, Feb 7, 2011 14:15
Subject: [Pdns-users] AXFR problem with pdns snapshots
To:
Hi,
I just noticed that one of the slave DNS servers (running
Hi,
I just noticed that one of the slave DNS servers (running Microsoft
DNS) is now unable to do a successful AXFR from my PowerDNS server
(running svn rev. 1991). This is for a non DNSSEC zone and the AXFR
works fine (with the same zone) when using pdns 2.9.22 on my side. It
appears to be specifi
WOW! Thanks for the info Bert :)
The Debian server that hosts PDNS Cursor doesn't apply any iptable rule... but
this server is behind a firewall (MikorTik Router) and this firewall has
tracking feature turned on...maybe because of that!!! and my uplstream
connection is only 1 Mbps full fiber.
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:38:42AM +, Maroon Ibrahim wrote:
> all-outqueries 501740
> outgoing-timeouts 352596
> throttled-outqueries76300
This mostly tells the story. Your pdns_recursor has problems talking to the
network at sufficient speed. Either this is caused by you requiring
Hi Bert,
got some time to have a look on my bad results :( ??
Thank you in advance,
> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:21:23 +0100
> From: bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl
> To: maroon_ibra...@hotmail.com
> CC: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
> Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low perf
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:48:30AM +, Maroon Ibrahim wrote:
> Thanks Stefan...
>
> SO, you just recommend to play only with max-cache-entries...?
>
> I have 4GB ram and Xeon CPU.
Let me put it this way:
Using a standard recursor.conf you should not need to tweak much more than the
max-cache
i forgot to CC the list on that one.
- Forwarded message from Stefan Schmidt -
> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:23:54 +0100
> From: Stefan Schmidt
> To: Maroon Ibrahim
> Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low performance
> !!!URGENT
>
> Hi Maroon,
>
> how about y
Thanks Stefan...
SO, you just recommend to play only with max-cache-entries...?
I have 4GB ram and Xeon CPU.
is it possible to cache the entries on disk?? is it recommended also?
> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:45:51 +0100
> From: zaph...@zaphods.net
> To: maroon_ibra...@hotmail.com
> CC: pdns-u
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:38:42AM +, Maroon Ibrahim wrote:
...
> AS for the recursor.conf... I still didn't touch it what is your best
> recommendation to have the opimum cache??
>
> Please advise
It depends on how much RAM you can spare.
Setting max-cache-entries=100 will use
### Before run-test
DNS:/# rec_control get-all
all-outqueries 501740
dlg-only-drops 0
dont-outqueries 26
outgoing-timeouts 352596
tcp-outqueries 35
throttled-out 76300
throttled-outqueries76300
unreachables426
ans
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:17:29AM +, Maroon Ibrahim wrote:
>
>
> As for the file descriptors, I already added the following:
>
> - in sysctl.conf : fs.file-max = 65535
>
> - in /etc/init.d/pdns-recursor
>
> #!/bin/sh
> # chkconfig: - 80 75
> # description: pdns_recursor is a versatil
As for the file descriptors, I already added the following:
- in sysctl.conf : fs.file-max = 65535
- in /etc/init.d/pdns-recursor
#!/bin/sh
# chkconfig: - 80 75
# description: pdns_recursor is a versatile high performance recursing
nameserver
ulimit -HSn 65536
How can I know that the ab
20 matches
Mail list logo
