Re: [Pdns-users] [Pdns-dev] PowerDNS performance

2011-01-07 Thread bert hubert
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 09:19:17PM +0800, jerry.du wrote: > Hi guys, > > I installed an authoritative PDNS server. Server configure 4 x Xero 3.4 > CPU, 4G memory. I used 16 mysql bankend threads. But only get around 40K qps > every time with queryperf. Somewhere around 50kqps there is a bottlen

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNSSEC Progress: ready for a first look

2011-01-07 Thread Leen Besselink
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:39:59AM +0100, bert hubert wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:24:12AM +0100, Leen Besselink wrote: > > > But their is one part I'm missing a way to hook up an EPP-client for > > sending the DS-record to the parent-zone. > > This could be added to pdnssec perhaps - is t

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNSSEC Progress: ready for a first look

2011-01-07 Thread bert hubert
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:24:12AM +0100, Leen Besselink wrote: > A (possibly hidden) supermaster which does all the DNSSEC signing and > the superslaves which only do > zone-trasfers and no online DNSSEC-signing but do understand enough of > the protocol to be able to serve it. This scenario is s

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNSSEC Progress: ready for a first look

2011-01-07 Thread Leen Besselink
On 01/06/2011 08:00 PM, bert hubert wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:55:24AM -0500, Mathew Hennessy wrote: >> Excellent! BTW, can PowerDNSSEC operate in the following way as one would >> expect: >> >> PowerDNS supermaster which has DNSSEC RRs but doesn't do DNSSEC (aka >> traditional PowerDNS)

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNSSEC Progress: ready for a first look

2011-01-07 Thread Frank Louwers
would be an excellent "way into dnssec". This wouldn't require any change to the existing (non-dnssec) powerdns setups, and would allow us to test with "real" things, easily migrate single domains to a dnssec setup (just change the nameservers), rollback when needed to the old and tested setup