Re: [Pdns-users] EDNS support + default buffer size

2010-03-17 Thread bert hubert
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:48:48PM +1300, Michael Fincham wrote: > Looking at the source it seems in 3.2 an option "disable-edns=no" was > added which turns EDNS support on. A cursory test here shows that adding > this to the stock config does cause the dns-oarc reply size test to > report a reply

[Pdns-users] EDNS support + default buffer size

2010-03-17 Thread Michael Fincham
Hi all, I've just tested the PowerDNS Recursor 3.2 with its out of the box configuration against the tests outlined at https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/services/replysizetest It seems that EDNS is disabled by default, which is confirmed by the comment attached to changeset #1430 (http://wiki.powerdn

Re: [Pdns-users] Spikey response times in powerdns recursor

2010-03-17 Thread Simon Bedford
Stefan Schmidt wrote: On 17.03.2010, at 12:37, Simon Bedford wrote: This is what is causing the mystery for me, when its good its really good but then response times go crazy at a random time, its dropped our customer experience graphing from 99.987% to 89% (some of this will be the 3.1.7.2 c

Re: [Pdns-users] Spikey response times in powerdns recursor

2010-03-17 Thread Stefan Schmidt
On 17.03.2010, at 12:37, Simon Bedford wrote: > > This is what is causing the mystery for me, when its good its really good but > then response times go crazy at a random time, its dropped our customer > experience graphing from 99.987% to 89% (some of this will be the 3.1.7.2 > cache mainten

Re: [Pdns-users] Spikey response times in powerdns recursor

2010-03-17 Thread bert hubert
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:37:24AM +, Simon Bedford wrote: > >bbc.co.uk still has a nameserver that is down, so having that domain resolve > >slowly every once in a while is to be expected. > > Agreed, there is the point that this does not happen in the day > though and although the cache will

Re: [Pdns-users] Spikey response times in powerdns recursor

2010-03-17 Thread Simon Bedford
bert hubert wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:16:40AM +, Simon Bedford wrote: Mar 17 11:57:02 [5] bbc.co.uk.: Resolved 'bbc.co.uk.' NS ns1.bbc.co.uk. to: 132.185.132.21 Mar 17 11:57:02 [5] bbc.co.uk.: Trying IP 132.185.132.21:53, asking 'bbc.co.uk.|A' Mar 17 11:57:04 [5] bbc.co.uk.: timeo

Re: [Pdns-users] Spikey response times in powerdns recursor

2010-03-17 Thread bert hubert
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:16:40AM +, Simon Bedford wrote: > >Mar 17 11:57:02 [5] bbc.co.uk.: Resolved 'bbc.co.uk.' NS ns1.bbc.co.uk. to: > >132.185.132.21 > >Mar 17 11:57:02 [5] bbc.co.uk.: Trying IP 132.185.132.21:53, asking > >'bbc.co.uk.|A' > >Mar 17 11:57:04 [5] bbc.co.uk.: timeout reso

Re: [Pdns-users] Spikey response times in powerdns recursor

2010-03-17 Thread Simon Bedford
bert hubert wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:43:19AM +, Simon Bedford wrote: We have been running recursor as a caching name server for a number of months having moved from unbound, since this time we see good, in fact quick DNS response time but then when running 3.1.7.1 and .2 and also 3

Re: [Pdns-users] Spikey response times in powerdns recursor

2010-03-17 Thread bert hubert
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:43:19AM +, Simon Bedford wrote: > We have been running recursor as a caching name server for a number > of months having moved from unbound, since this time we see good, in > fact quick DNS response time but then when running 3.1.7.1 and .2 > and also 3.2.1 we see ra

[Pdns-users] Spikey response times in powerdns recursor

2010-03-17 Thread Simon Bedford
Hi guys, Apologies if this has been discussed before but as a new mailling list user I have not seen anything. We have been running recursor as a caching name server for a number of months having moved from unbound, since this time we see good, in fact quick DNS response time but then when