Re: [Pdns-users] Pdns-recurser not decrementing TTL

2010-03-09 Thread bert hubert
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:35:22PM +0200, Paul Wollner wrote: > I have just upgraded from PowerDNS recursor 3.1.7.2 to 3.2. Unfortunately it > appears the TTLs for records are never decremented. > > For the meantime I have reverted to 3.1.7.2. Is anyone else experiencing this > problem? Try se

[Pdns-users] Pdns-recurser not decrementing TTL

2010-03-09 Thread Paul Wollner
Hi all, I have just upgraded from PowerDNS recursor 3.1.7.2 to 3.2. Unfortunately it appears the TTLs for records are never decremented. For the meantime I have reverted to 3.1.7.2. Is anyone else experiencing this problem? Regards Paul Wollner ___

Re: [Pdns-users] Hardware Questions

2010-03-09 Thread bert hubert
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:39:43AM -0800, Zane Thomas wrote: > Assuming a reasonably performing backend (mysql?) what hardware will be > required for powerdns to answer 70,000q/sec of "normal traffic" (I'm not > sure I know how to define that!). It depends on what number of zones and records you h

[Pdns-users] Hardware Questions

2010-03-09 Thread Zane Thomas
Anyone, Assuming a reasonably performing backend (mysql?) what hardware will be required for powerdns to answer 70,000q/sec of "normal traffic" (I'm not sure I know how to define that!). Tia, Zane ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns

[Pdns-users] Hardware Requirements Questions

2010-03-09 Thread Zane Thomas
Anyone, Assuming a reasonably performing backend (mysql?) what hardware will be required for powerdns to answer 70,000q/sec of "normal traffic" (I'm not sure I know how to define that!). Tia, Zane ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns

Re: [Pdns-users] Compile error PDNS-recursor 3.2.0 Solaris 10-sparc

2010-03-09 Thread Fabien Seisen
2010/3/8 Christian Kuehn > Hi All, > > try to compile the new recursor and get finally this error: > got the same error. Solaris10 is bundled with (/usr/sfw/bin/gcc --version) and gcc3 does not recognize the -pthreads arguments => use gcc4 (blastwave for eg) i use: MAKE=/opt/csw/bin/gmake CX

Re: [Pdns-users] Negative cache problem since upgrade to 3.2

2010-03-09 Thread Oli Schacher
bert hubert schrieb: > > For now, you could solve this problem by setting packet-cache-ttl to a lower > number, say 20 seconds. Thanks a lot for your quick reply, this seems to help, new records show up much faster now. > > Can you also open tickets on http://wiki.powerdns.com (login with the >

Re: [Pdns-users] Negative cache problem since upgrade to 3.2

2010-03-09 Thread bert hubert
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Oli Schacher wrote: > Hi list > > We upgraded our resolvers to 3.2 (Centos5, 64bit) > After the upgrade, the setting max-negative-ttl=30 does not seem to work > anymore. New records take up several minutes until they show up in the > cache. > Even if we ex

[Pdns-users] Negative cache problem since upgrade to 3.2

2010-03-09 Thread Oli Schacher
Hi list We upgraded our resolvers to 3.2 (Centos5, 64bit) After the upgrade, the setting max-negative-ttl=30 does not seem to work anymore. New records take up several minutes until they show up in the cache. Even if we explicitely perform a "rec_control wipe-cache" on those new A record we get NX

Re: [Pdns-users] Multipart TXT records

2010-03-09 Thread Chris Sarginson
I've now stuck a little bit in the FAQ with regards to this - hopefully any future users will be able to find this with minimal effort and prevent any lost time. Chris -Original Message- From: pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com [mailto:pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com] On B

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNS Recursor 3.2 Available

2010-03-09 Thread Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
Steve Spencer wrote: > Just want to make sure this package is actually newer. I'm getting this > message when I attempt to update the recursor on an CentOS5.x box: > > rpm -Uvh pdns-recursor-3.2-1.i386.rpm > Preparing...### > [100%] >